My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-20-1990 Planning Packet
Orono
>
Planning Commission
>
1990
>
08-20-1990 Planning Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2022 9:25:58 AM
Creation date
12/1/2022 9:19:28 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
316
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
It I uKiH <br />Zoning File #1565 <br />July 13, 1990 <br />Page 3 <br />The proposed screened porch in the landscape plan is located <br />approximately 6' from the side lot line. A 10' setback would <br />normally be required here, and staff would question whether there <br />is any justification to allow a variance for this location. <br />Staff would recommend that no such variance be granted. <br />Regarding the portion of deck requiring a handrail, raising <br />the grade at the edge of the deck would not be advisable since <br />that would direct more runoff to the neighbors. Cutting the deck <br />back to a point where it is less than 30" above grade would <br />possibly be feasible. Note that any future proposal to put a <br />railing on the deck in any location less than 10' from the lot <br />line, would need a variance. <br />As to hardcover on the property, the proposed landscape plan <br />appears to decrease the intensity of hardcover on the property <br />from the current levels, and could be considered a positive step. <br />The erosion problems noted by applicant in his various letters <br />stem not only from the fact that the house sits slightly downhill <br />from another property to the rear, but are probably increased by <br />the amount of hard surface areas on the property. This attempt <br />to minimize erosion by creating hardcover areas, increases the <br />risk of intensifying erosion in the remaining non-hardcovered <br />areas. <br />The landscape p7‘'n does not specify the use of retaining <br />walls in the rear yard, hence staff would presume that this area <br />is intended to be minimally graded and seeded or sodded to direct <br />drainage around the house. Applicant should be required to <br />provide a grading p'an where changes in grade are proposed. <br />The property does not currently contain a garage, and has <br />access both from Crystal Bay Road at the front and from a <br />privately maintained neighborhood driveway along the railroad <br />tracks at the rear. While applicant has not proposed to <br />construct a garage. Planning Commission may wish to consider <br />where such a structure could be placed in the future and how that <br />would affect hardcover on the property. The gravel parking area <br />along Old Crystal Bay Road certainly is not a situation the City <br />would prefer to continue permanently, given that it acts as a 50' <br />wide curb cut. <br />The second house on the property is not an issue in this <br />application, although it is a uniquely located structure <br />straddling the City boundaries. Applicant has never applied for <br />guest house status of this structure. It does have plumbing. To <br />staff's knowledge, this structure is currently being used as <br />storage,only. Applicant has been advised that use of that <br />residence as a guest house technically requires a conditional use <br />permit from the City of Orono. Staff has not investigated <br />whether similar rules would apply for Minnetonka Beach.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.