Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1509 <br />April 11, 1990 <br />Page 2 of 3 <br />List of Brhibits <br />Exhibit A <br />Exhibit B <br />Exhibit C <br />Exhibit D <br />Exhibit E <br />Exhibit F <br />Exhibit G <br />Exhibit K <br />Application <br />Property Owners List <br />Plat Map <br />1-D2 Section Maps <br />Oman's Letter 1/1/90 <br />Building Permit #3093 for Accessory Structure <br />6/27/75 <br />Council Minutes 6/24/75 <br />Survey <br />Review of Application - <br />As a result of the above referenced harardous building <br />action, the existing accessory structure is in violation of the <br />Zoning Code and requires variance approval if it is allowed to <br />remain. A permit was issued for the construction of the <br />accessory structure in 1975 and is approximately 2,400+ square <br />feet in area. In 1975, an accessory structure classified as a <br />barn or stable could exceed 1,000 square feet. A permit was <br />specifically issued for stable use. The Code in 1975 would have <br />required a 150' setback from all property lines. Note the survey <br />shows less than the 150' setback from the east and west side lot <br />lines. On June 24, 1975 the City approved setback variances for <br />the proposed barn structure. <br />The applicant has advised because of his business <br />committments out of state, that he will be unable to build his <br />own residence on the property, but plans to offer the property <br />for sale. It is hoped that the City will allow him to keep the <br />accessory structure for the future owner of the site. <br />The subject structure is not used as a barn, but serves as a <br />storage building. Applicant should provide information as to the <br />current use. Is it rented for storage use, or does owner use it <br />for storage? The City should ask for confirmation during the <br />interim period that there is appropriate insurance coverage on <br />the subject structure. In recent years, it would appear that the <br />structure has not been used as an accessory use for the renters <br />of the residence on the property, but as accessory storage for <br />the owner who lived off-site. If the applicant is granted <br />variance approval, it will be necessary for the applicant to <br />designate a local person or agent responsible for the maintenance <br />and supervision of the structure. It should be noted for the <br />record that staff has never received complaints from adjacent <br />neighbors regarding the use of this structure, nor has staff ever <br />observed any traffic on the site. Applicant should provide <br />Information as to what is stored within the building. <br />i r