Laserfiche WebLink
^|wriiiiiiT' T" <br />Zoning File #1509 <br />Anril 11, 1990 <br />3 age 3 of 3 <br />Staff has received no comments from the neighbors notified <br />for this variance review. <br />Options of Action - <br />1. <br />2. <br />Denial, refer to Section 10.08, Subdivision 3 (A) for <br />necessary findings for denial and recommend a date for <br />removal of the accessory structure. <br />Approval. Planning Commission may consider some of the <br />following findings: <br />A) The existing residence was removed as a result of <br />a hazardous building action creating a violation on the <br />subject property. <br />B) The subject structure is in good structural <br />condition and satisfies the setback standards for an <br />oversized accessory structure based on the recent code <br />amendment. <br />C) Applicant has made payment for all fees incurred <br />during the hazardous building action and all real <br />estate taxes, etc. are up to date. <br />Approval is subject to the following condition: <br />1. Applicant shall provide proof of liability insurance and <br />designate local agent responsible for structure as applicant <br />lives out of state. <br />2. No housing of animals allowed during duration of <br />variance. <br />3. Storage shall be limited to the following items: <br />a. agricultural equipment <br />b. seed, fertilizer, plant materials <br />c. other items recommended by Planning Commission <br />d. What would Planning Commission recommend against? <br />or no storage use during effective period of variance. <br />4. Applicant should be placed on notice that it has been <br />the policy to limit such variance applications to one year <br />or less, depending on the use or type of structure under <br />consideration. <br />■ ^ <br />M <br />«