Laserfiche WebLink
himutes of the planning commission meeting no R 20, 1989 <br />!' <br />MHISG file subdivision. Mabusth noted <br />Bellows indicated that she would prefer to see a PRD if <br />there is to be a subdivision of this property. She said that the <br />Ihould not resemble a conventional 3-lot subdivision and that <br />it may be impossible to accomplish that. <br />Kelley asked Bellows if she would accept a PRD that would <br />have the 3 pads on Lot 1 and the septic systems on Lot 2? <br />Bellows said yes she would accept that. <br />Gaffron advised the Planning Commission that there is an <br />"Clifciu-^d^that the area for the drainageway would not have to be exclu <br />from the total area if developed as a PRD. <br />Trt n"o\'\%“b%°/larar..s =lu»«rin, hc.a„ but <br />rather there are three separate building areas. <br />Bellows said that the Partens may not be able to do all that <br />they want to do with this property. <br />M«s Parten said that they would be willing to clean up some <br />rtf fhe citv's oroblems with access. She noted that when making <br />SA/uit.^\"a! ?a%%%n“’sa"a\b-t'Vt al.^rAA^a^^tu^ftb-’a-t fbta <br />parcel cannot be subdivided. <br />Planning Commissioner Brown asked if a f <br />been made as ?o whether easements exist for the northwest lots to <br />cross the Luce Line? <br />Mr. Asao said that he and the Dieters have an easement in <br />the form of a right-of-way from the DNR. <br />Planning Commissioner Brown suggested leaving the Styles* <br />property undeveloped. <br />Mr Asao said that he had looked at the possibility of <br />purchasing the Styles' property which would bring his proper y P <br />to City standards. <br />Kelley said that would be favorable <br />hut it would also require the Partens to put in ® <br />Liveway to serve two houses. Kelley asked for <br />tlannlnq ConStission as to the Partens proceeding with a 2-lot