Laserfiche WebLink
MINDTES OP THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 20, 1989 <br />ZONING PILE #1470-PARTEN CONTINL«- <br />Kelley observed that if Outlet A were put in with only a 50 <br />easement. Outlet A and Lot 1 will be contiguous. <br />Gaffron suggested creating a more narrow Outlet A. <br />Hanson noted that such a configuation would create "the <br />ultimate flag lot". <br />Bellows indicated that she did not approve of this <br />configuration. <br />Hanson indicated that the land would lend itself well to <br />development with the adjacent property# <br />Bellows suggested the property be developed as a 3-lot PRD <br />with the hoLllTlustered. She said that what the Partens are <br />proposing more closely resembles a conventional subdivision. <br />Mabusth interjected that the Planning Commission s <br />to have the septic systems included in the homestead pad with a <br />PRD proposal made it very difficult. <br />syst.r i:rn/"Sea ““ Irea. <br />sep^!rsystem location is an item that had to give in order to <br />not have this application be a typical subdivision. <br />Ms. Parten explained that the PRD being proposed is the best <br />that can be done due to the topography of the land. <br />guarantees a certain amount of lots. <br />MS. Parten said that she was frustrated because she could <br />not understand how there could be 50 acres in an area that will <br />not sustain 4 lots. <br />2-lot^8ub™isiln he^UgglsSd Sith°the^2 outlots. ^ <br />Bellows replied that she was uncomfortable with the overall <br />shape of the subdivision and the location of the alternate septic <br />site for Lot 2. <br />Mabusth suggested that it would not be <br />uniaue findings that would still allow denial of other ^ <br />uni^e applications seeking lot area variances for <br />lots. Mabusth said that the extension of the <br />inclusion of the Styles property placed restrictions <br />deSellpSLt of the parcel. Mabusth said that an area variance <br />\ <br />\