Laserfiche WebLink
To:Planning Commission Chairman Kelley <br />Orono Planning Commission Members <br />City Administrator Bernhardson <br />From: Michael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />Date:November 14, 1989 <br />Subject: #1470 Daniel Parten, 430r; Bayside Road - <br />Preliminary Subdivision ' Continuation of Public Hearing <br />Application - 3-lot Plat <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A <br />Exhibit B <br />Exhibit C <br />Exhibit D <br />Memo from Applicants <br />Large Size Proposed Plat Drawings <br />Planning Commission Action Notice 10/20/89 <br />Memo & Exhibits of 10/10/89 <br />Discussion - <br />The applicants have met with staff and have attempted to <br />address Planning Commission's concerns with their revised <br />proposal, a 3-lot plat. This proposal results in three lots of <br />4.3, 4.4, and 6.0 acres respectively. They would be served by a <br />50' private driveway outlet that connects to the Reiersgord <br />property to the east and to the Asao property on the northwest. <br />Each lot would meet the lot width standard as measured at <br />the 50' setback from the road outlet. Lots 2 and 3 would require <br />a lot area variance. <br />The applicants request that they not be required to pave any <br />portion of the road/driveway within the outlet. They propose to <br />construct an 18' wide gravel driveway to the turn-around area <br />(see Sheet 2 of the large scale site plan) and a 14' wide gravel <br />driveway to Lots 2 and 3. <br />Alternatives - <br />Please review the applicants' memo. They have considered <br />two alternatives to the proposal. Their Exhibit A indicates a <br />two lot plat excluding the northernmost parcel from the <br />subdivision, wherein each lot would contain 5 acres, being served <br />by a 50' private driveway outlet. Under this scheme, they would <br />not be required to pave, and this would be considered as merely a <br />shared driveway. Such a proposal does not resolve any of the <br />concerns with surrounding properties and would likely make it <br />harder in the future for those access problems to be resolved <br />either by the City or by the affected property owners. <br />r_ C •: