My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-17-1986 Planning Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1986
>
11-17-1986 Planning Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/20/2022 12:25:01 PM
Creation date
10/20/2022 12:21:37 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 17, 1986 <br />ZONING AKENDMENT - PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR NON -RENTAL/ <br />been <br />GUEST APARTMENTS WITHIN PRINCIPAL RESIDENCES <br />PUBLIC HEARING 10:50 - 10:51 <br />ba 1 1 y <br />The Affidavit of Publication was noted. <br />into <br />y and <br />No one was present from the public regarding this matter <br />Mused <br />and the pc:blic hearing was closed. <br />:)d Rd. <br />?rmine <br />Assistant Zoning Administrator Gaf f ron explained the <br />allow <br />intent of the proposed amendment. to establish <br />performance standards for non -rental guest apartments <br />e for <br />within principal residences. He stated that the <br />Planning Commission should address these issues: <br />.n the <br />a) Is the "double the lot area" standard reasonable <br />ra 1 of <br />for a guest apartment. <br />b) Parking concerns? <br />e barn Chairman Kel ley stated that he felt such guest <br />g the apartments should be allowed under a conditional use <br />permit. He would like to avoid complete separate living <br />areas. <br />at he <br />it has Bellows stated that she would like to avoid an exterior <br />m the appearance of a duplex, but not legislate against live-- <br />in help etc. <br />►t the Taylor stated that he was not as concerned about the <br />ohm's separate entrance issue, and would prefer to continue <br />got to treating these on a case by case basis. <br />this <br />Planning Commission directed staff to bring back to <br />their next meeting a proposed wording and performance <br />posed <br />standards for guest apartments as a Conditional Use, <br />)ncern <br />incorporating the following concepts: <br />1. I,ot area is not a concern if septic and parking <br />concerns are met; performance standards for these <br />ke to <br />shou 1G be proposed. <br />phased <br />2. The Conditional Use Permit: review process will <br />address the visual impact on the neighborhood of <br />each specific situation, with the goal that the <br />natter <br />guest apartment should not be an obvious second <br />dwelling unit when viewed f j,m without, and should <br />not have the appearance of a dupl rix, i.e. not have <br />�y, <br />two obvious "main entrances". <br />;ente <br />ed <br />3. Primary access to the guest apartment should be <br />Naysr <br />from within the residence, but secondary accesses <br />are allowable. <br />4. Wet bars and basement kitchens ;proposed with new <br />homes or remodelings that are obviously not meant to <br />become second dwelling urt i t s, need not apply for a <br />Conditional Use Permit as long as the building <br />permit states that they may not become second <br />dwe 1 1 ing tin its. <br />0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.