My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-17-1986 Planning Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1986
>
11-17-1986 Planning Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/20/2022 12:25:01 PM
Creation date
10/20/2022 12:21:37 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Hinu1'ES OF THE NAMING COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 17, 1986 <br /># 10 9 3 P i A INVESTMENT CONTINUED <br />1. Designated wetland on Lot 2 which has been <br />drained for many years. <br />2. Access location. Hennepin County has verbally <br />approved access to County Rd. 6, although tying into <br />Tanglewood Rd. would be preferable to City and <br />applicants. The Taog 1 ewood Homeowners have refused <br />applicants' request to access onto Tanglewood Rd. <br />City Attorney is reviewing this matter to determine <br />whether the C'.' ty can force the Association to allow <br />additional use of the road. <br />3. Staff finds no pressing need to provide for <br />future access to the north or east. <br />4. Barn on proposed Lot 3 would end up within the <br />front yard setback area, staff recommends removal of <br />this structure. <br />Mr. Adams stated that they would be willing to move barn <br />and incur the additional costs of determining the <br />wetland status. <br />Pete Rennebohm, 1520 <br />finds no problem with <br />concerns regarding <br />wetland. <br />Tanglewood Rd., stated that he <br />the proposed subdivision but has <br />the drainage pattern from the <br />Assistant Zoning Administrator <br />City Engineer will be asked to <br />concern before Council review. <br />have an additional access on <br />decision is up to the County. <br />Gaffron stated that the <br />address Mr. Renn�bohm's <br />City woa 1 �' prefer not to <br />County Rd. 6, but this <br />Hanson asked why the Tanglewood homeowners are opposed <br />to allowing access onto Tanglewood Rd., noting concern <br />about more accesses onto County Road 6. <br />Mr. Rennebohm, speaking for himself, would like to <br />maintain the low traffic density for which he purchased <br />his property. <br />No one was present from the public regarding this matter <br />and the public hearing was closed. <br />It was moved by Goet.ten, seconded by Chairman Kelley, to <br />recommend approval of the preliminary plat as presented <br />subject to staff recommendation. Motion, Ayes 5, Nays <br />0. <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.