Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE PLANN I NG COMMISSION MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 17 , 1986 <br />#1090 80 BR CONTINUED <br />Planning Commission Comments - <br />Bellows stated that she felt the Planning Commission <br />should not act on this application until clean-up of <br />property is done and original subdivision conditions <br />-ire complied with. She visited the site and felt the <br />buildings are in a state of disrepair and that the <br />rental house unit is not consistent with the other <br />properties as they have been developed. <br />Goetten stated that she has <br />with Bellows comments. S'L: <br />property lacks the required <br />guest house. <br />seen the property and agrees <br />noted that the rental house <br />area to approve the use of a <br />Hanson agreed that the original subdivision conditions <br />should be complied with. <br />It was moved by Taylor, seconded by Bellows, to table <br />this application and continue the public hearing pending <br />resolution of the outstanding issues. Motion, Ayes 5, <br />Nays 0. <br />Mr. Hollander noted that he has recently put money into <br />the clean-up of his property and that his mother never <br />intended that his house be razed. <br />Mr. Weinstein disputed Mr. Hollander's statement and <br />asked the Planning Commission to inspect the property to <br />make their own determination of the property's <br />condition. <br />Goetten asked staff to <br />moving the lot line a <br />necessity of a lot width <br /># 10 9 3 P i A IWESTMENT <br />1380 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH <br />SUBDIVISION <br />PUBLIC HEARING 8:15 - 8:38 <br />consider the possibility of <br />few feet. in order to avoid the <br />variance on Lot 1. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing <br />was noted. <br />Applicants John Adams and Scott Powell were present for <br />this matter. <br />Assistant <br />Zoning Administrator <br />Gaf f ron explained <br />the <br />request to <br />subdivide a parcel of <br />land into 4 lots. A11 <br />four proposed <br />lots meet the 2 acre <br />minimum dry <br />buildable <br />requirement; <br />have adequate building <br />envelopes, <br />have been <br />tested for <br />dr.ainfield sites (but <br />not approved <br />by staff). <br />Issues of concern are as follows: <br />