Laserfiche WebLink
�I <br />for gras3r►'t <br />the <br />r dredging <br />usese <br />cres to a <br />of the <br />Lake <br />:he horses <br />proposed <br />a hazard <br />)nd for <br />ig of a <br />its lie <br />to plant <br />l for <br />L with the <br />Location <br />it a <br />n on the <br />Jscic 1r�ode 1410 BoIns>,t Road- - - <br />`%ariame <br />Pigs 2 $ <br />A conditiaul use permit would also be required if the applicant is given approval <br />of modeling the existing structure as a Guest hose. If we do spprove this <br />conditional use we could stipulate that this property not be sold as atwo-Easily <br />aril. A variance aid conditional use permit would also be required if we are to <br />permit the owner to canstnut a seoa►d or third dock an this property. It appears <br />the previous ors gave lake access and dock easements across this property to <br />� adjoining PT"Orty owners located off the lakashore. I understand these <br />docks were in before our ordinance for me dock per property *rent into effect. <br />We might consider substituting one cawnadock. <br />PUNNING COMISSION WORK SESSION - 12 6 - 76 <br />Showed concern about er,%croaching average setback of adjacent houses, Suggested <br />me residence on •' - �`� ly . Either remodel existing carriage house or raze carriage <br />house and construct new dwelling further back from lake to eliminate possibility <br />Of infringingon lake view of neighbors,A� y <br />PLAM I NG CCX MI SS IGN � M. I NC - December 2 0 , 1976 <br />Attorney, Lorens Brynestad, represented � r. RhMe. After reviewing the proposal, <br />the Planning Comiss ion suggested the applicant submit a revised proposal indica- <br />ting the following: ' <br />1, Plan with one residence only (restore and remodel existing carriage house) <br />or raze existing structure and build new residence further back from the <br />lake so as not to encroach on neighbor's Lakeshore setback. <br />3. <br />4. <br />Submit statement of no objection to proposed house location from adjoining <br />neighbors. <br />New flame would meet side and rear setback requirements (if existing, <br />struct2 ire is to be restored, the location is already determined) , <br />One dock only with sufficient slips to accnrrRodate dock rights of parties <br />who had dock easements over the property Prior to the City's adopt ion <br />of the new dock regu t a t ions - <br />.. <br />DATE <br />SIJ[3.TECf <br />The inc r <br />will add <br />of Old C <br />and we f <br />Addition <br />located <br />to the r <br />Me urba <br />wh ich de <br />t i al zon <br />Our ca►►p <br />areas fo <br />of inc re <br />The ins t, <br />to a r.1or <br />thereby <br />off ratil <br />a f fect in; <br />Urbani za <br />and ecol, <br />fare o f <br />7. 17iis smn <br />C1pa1 5@I <br />8. Increaser <br />hazards <br />obtain a <br />'SW I improven <br />9. Increase <br />meet wou: <br />The irmoi <br />. <br />by the vl <br />groups ar <br />protect • <br />the dual i <br />