My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-14-2021 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2021
>
06-14-2021 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/9/2021 7:26:26 AM
Creation date
11/9/2021 7:21:52 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
Text box
ID:
1
Creator:
Created:
11/9/2021 7:26 AM
Modified:
11/9/2021 7:26 AM
Text:
Council Exhibit D
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
211
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Date Application Received: 04/21/2021 <br />Date Application Considered as Complete: 05/04/2021 <br />60-Day Review Period Expires: 07/03/2021 <br /> <br /> <br />To: Chair Kirchner and Planning Commission Members <br /> Adam Edwards, City Administrator <br /> <br />From: Melanie Curtis, Planner mcc <br /> <br />Date: 17 May 2021 <br /> <br />Subject: #LA21-000031, Doug Johnson o/b/o Steve Zawoyski, 724 Tonkawa Rd <br />Variance <br />Public Hearing <br /> <br /> <br />Background <br />In 2011, the property owners received variances in order to build the new home and detached <br />garage. Resolution No. 6083 granted lot area and lot width variances, a hardcover variance <br />permitting 32.9% hardcover where 25% is allowed, and a rear setback variance for the detached <br />garage to be set back 15 feet from the rear/street yard where a 30-foot setback is required. <br /> <br />The applicant is requesting a variance to add a second story above the existing detached garage. <br />The garage has a street-facing overhead door which requires the building to be set at the <br />principal building setback of 30 feet. The garage is set at 15.6 feet from the rear property line. <br /> <br />Practical Difficulties Analysis <br />Applicant Submittal Information: The applicant has identified the lot width and topography of <br />the property as practical difficulties supporting the requested variance. Additionally, they have <br />provided supporting documentation regarding Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit B, and <br />should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. <br /> <br />Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Regarding practical difficulty, Staff finds the lot width, <br />topography, and the proximity of the existing garage to the rear lot line support the requested <br />variance. <br /> <br /> <br />Application Summary: The applicant is requesting rear setback variance in order to construct <br />a second story addition on an existing detached garage. <br />Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends approval.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.