My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-14-2021 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2021
>
06-14-2021 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/9/2021 7:26:26 AM
Creation date
11/9/2021 7:21:52 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
Text box
ID:
1
Creator:
Created:
11/9/2021 7:26 AM
Modified:
11/9/2021 7:26 AM
Text:
Council Exhibit C
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
211
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Date Application Received: 04/20/2021 <br />Date Application Considered as Complete: 04/20/2021 <br />60-Day Review Period Expires: 06/19/2021 <br /> <br /> <br />To: Chair Kirchner and Planning Commission Members <br /> Adam Edwards, City Administrator <br /> <br />From: Melanie Curtis, Planner mcc <br /> <br />Date: 17 May 2021 <br /> <br />Subject: #LA21-000030, Tom Bergstrom, 1509 Long Lake Blvd, <br />Variances <br />Public Hearing <br /> <br /> <br />Background <br />In 2018, the applicant received variances to lot area, width, rear setback, 75-foot lake setback, <br />and side yard setback in order to redevelop this property with a new home and 179 square foot <br />deck. At this time the applicant is requesting rear setback and 75-foot lake setback variances in <br />order to expand the existing deck by 227 square feet (including staircase). The property owner <br />has indicated a willingness to remove an 80 square foot patio within the 75-foot setback to <br />facilitate approval of the requested variances. <br /> <br />Practical Difficulties Analysis <br />Applicant Submittal Information: The applicant has identified the substandard size of the lot and <br />the topography as practical difficulties supporting the requested variance(s). Additionally, they <br />have provided supporting documentation regarding Practical Difficulties attached as Exhibit B, <br />and should be asked for additional testimony regarding the application. <br /> <br />Planning Staff Practical Difficulty Analysis: Regarding practical difficulty, Staff finds that this lot <br />is unique due to the curve of the shoreline creating a diagonal 75-foot setback across the <br />property. The 75-foot lake setback overlaps the 50 foot rear yard setback nearly eliminating the <br />building envelope on the lot. <br /> <br /> <br />Application Summary: The applicant is requesting rear yard and 75-foot lake yard setback <br />variances to construct a deck expansion. <br />Staff Recommendation: Planning Department Staff recommends denial as noted.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.