My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-14-2021 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2021
>
06-14-2021 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/9/2021 7:26:26 AM
Creation date
11/9/2021 7:21:52 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
211
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Monday, May 17, 2021 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br />a hallway on a deck to work inside of that. He noted it would be a very small corner, less than 10 square <br />feet in total in that area; he showed the house that was torn down less than two years ago on screen. <br /> <br />Kirchner noted the Commission has a note from a neighbor stating they have no concerns with the <br />proposal. <br /> <br />Ressler stated the Commission has to work with what they have as guidelines for the City. There have <br />been other applications that have had as reasonable or more reasonable means for approving the <br />application – however, it has been made loud-and-clear that the City Council does not necessarily agree <br />and they draw a pretty hard line on meeting the defined practical difficulties. He thinks that will be the <br />pushback regardless of the outcome of the Commission’s vote. Once it gets to the Council it is not <br />necessarily something that is granted. <br /> <br />Libby asked the applicant if there is any resistance to modify the proposed deck in a more linear manner <br />in the front where the encroachment into the 75 foot setback is, bringing the deck front, back, equal, to <br />deck B. He asked Curtis if that would bring it back enough out of the 75 foot setback? <br /> <br />Mr. Bergstrom would be willing to do that, he has met with the City several times and sent dozens of <br />emails, and the hardship is the corner of the deck. He would be absolutely open to any work around to try <br />to enjoy the hardcover space up to 25%. <br /> <br />Libby said the encroachment into the 75 foot setback and the surface area of the patio are really not a <br />trade-off because there would still be a remaining encroachment in to the 75 with the physical location of <br />the deck. He is trying to take a constructive method in designing the deck to remove the encroachment <br />into the75 which the Commission has regularly and consistently maintained as a metric of ordinance. <br /> <br />Bollis asked if Mr. Bergstrom has a calculation for the amount of the proposed deck over the 75 foot <br />setback. <br /> <br />Mr. Bergstrom replied approximately 16 feet total. He would be removing approximately 95 square feet <br />of hardcover which is better for the City and better for the lakes. <br /> <br />Ressler does not feel that it is a fair exchange removing hardcover in exchange for structure. He does not <br />think it is an unreasonable ask but he does not know it can be approved under the guidelines the <br />Commission must abide by. <br /> <br />Ressler moved, seconded by Libby, to deny LA21-000030, 1509 Long Lake Blvd, Variances as <br />submitted. VOTE: Ayes: 7, Nays 0. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.