My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-26-2021 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2021
>
04-26-2021 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2021 4:37:54 PM
Creation date
11/8/2021 4:35:36 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, April 12, 2021 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 6 of 15 <br /> <br />17. LA21-000017 – Joseph & Sara Thull, 480 Big Island, Permit for Dock City on ROW (Bay Place) <br />– Continued <br /> <br />Seals said the way this was written - she is sure there was some logic - but in reality it just puts neighbors <br />against each other so she questions the rationale behind some of it. She definitely likes the idea of <br />thinking about the interior lots and how they can gain access for everyone at once in a smart way and <br />having it come from those residents rather than the Council. <br /> <br />Crosby asked how many interior lots there are. <br /> <br />Walsh thinks for that piece in that little area there are three or four. <br /> <br />Johnson does not think any dock storage should be on City property. <br /> <br />Seals agreed. <br /> <br />Walsh said they should have to bring the dock up into their yard. He welcomed anyone else to come up <br />and talk about it and noted they have all the transcripts from the Planning Commission meeting. <br /> <br />Joe and Sara Thull, Applicants, approached the podium and Mr. Thull wants to convey that they are open <br />and amenable to a solution that works for everyone. He has no objection to that and thinks it makes <br />sense. The timeline was brought up and he is hearing that the Council is putting it back on the group to <br />collaborate and solve. He gave a bit of background noting he has tried to get an easement and has been <br />unsuccessful to date – he even went to Three Rivers Park District where the road cuts off about 25 feet <br />short. He started there and did not have any luck, then he went to the easement route and has not <br />exhausted that list but went to a number of people and was unsuccessful there. He went to the City and <br />said he has identified multiple locations where there are rights-of-way and asked where they suggest is the <br />best place based on topography, emergency equipment, etcetera. He came to Site 1 which also has the <br />other permanent dock. It was a progression to get there and if there are alternative locations, whether Site <br />3 or Site 2 or wherever, Mr. Thull thinks there are enough right-of-way points that if they take four lots <br />and come back with a single dock and each person gets a side at Site 3 and Site 1, that might resolve it. <br />Then the Council may not have this repeated aspect. He is open to collaborating with neighbors and he is <br />just looking for the outcome. <br /> <br />Walsh noted the Council cannot make anyone talk but they are encouraging everyone to talk. It is a <br />portion of code that says nobody has the right to have a dock there so now he suggested figuring out <br />where everyone can have a win-win and solve this moving forward. <br /> <br />Mr. Thull had a conversation with Matthew Cook at LMCD to get his input who said he can be quoted on <br />this: LMCD understands the highly unique aspect of Big Island and has also had these discussions. Mr. <br />Cook is familiar with the situation and knows that there are a limited number of interior lots that do not <br />have access. Mr. Cook said the internal discussions have been if the City can come up with some type of <br />permit or license, the LMCD will not stand in the way because they know access is highly limited. 99% <br />of the issues the LMCD deals with is people accessing the lake and this situation is the reverse, it is the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.