My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-26-2021 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2021
>
04-26-2021 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2021 4:37:54 PM
Creation date
11/8/2021 4:35:36 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, April 12, 2021 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 7 of 15 <br /> <br />17. LA21-000017 – Joseph & Sara Thull, 480 Big Island, Permit for Dock City on ROW (Bay Place) <br />– Continued <br /> <br />1% of people needing to access the lake to get to their property. It is unique from that standpoint. He <br />wants to express to his neighbors that he is willing and open to figure out a plausible and reasonable way <br />– it may not be the perfect solution – but he thinks they can get something that works for everyone. <br /> <br />Walsh hopes they can come back in a couple weeks and have some conversations with the family that has <br />the dock and the others, if they are interested. <br /> <br />Mr. Thull noted another interior neighbor is here tonight. <br /> <br />Walsh asked them to talk and collaborate and come back to the Council and tell what their thoughts are. <br /> <br />The neighbor at 490 Big Island approached the podium and said he understands that anyone adjacent to 1, <br />2, 3, and 4 is probably not going to want a dock. The next step is what will happen if they say number 2 <br />or 3 is good because they are the widest but the neighbors say no. Then they are back to square one. <br /> <br />Walsh noted number 1 already has something in place Now the question is can they collaborate and work <br />together and everyone can be at that one or talk to the others and maybe they will not have a problem with <br />a dock and there will be more options. <br /> <br />The neighbor stated being a lake owner himself, those people don’t want a public dock next door. He <br />said if everyone adjacent to these say no, he wonders. <br /> <br />Walsh replied there is already one spot that has a dock regardless, because there is a right to have a dock <br />there. Can the people who don’t have interior lots collaborate and work together to see what that would <br />look like? He would like to have the conversation with the adjacent neighbor also on the placement. <br /> <br />The neighbor at 490 Big Island said they probably would not need a 6 foot dock, a 4 foot would probably <br />be fine and if they had 6 foot boats on each side they are really talking about 15-16 feet total in width <br />unless it is two pontoons on each side. <br /> <br />Walsh thinks it behooves everyone that does not have access to talk and work together. <br /> <br />Johnson thinks the people that do not have access are going to be very quick to find a solution. Where the <br />problem will be is if someone lives there, they do not want a dock there. His opinion is this: the City has <br />already demonstrated that the interior lots will have access by the one that is there. That tells Johnson he <br />is going to find a solution for the other interior lots to have the same privilege that another person had <br />since 1986. He likes Walsh’s idea as the property owners know what is best and the least intrusive way to <br />do that. If they cannot come to the conclusion, Johnson is prepared to come up with his own solution of <br />getting people access out there because the City gave it to someone already. <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.