My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-26-2021 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
2021
>
04-26-2021 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/8/2021 4:37:54 PM
Creation date
11/8/2021 4:35:36 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
110
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, April 12, 2021 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 5 of 15 <br /> <br />17. LA21-000017 – Joseph & Sara Thull, 480 Big Island, Permit for Dock City on ROW (Bay Place) <br />– Continued <br /> <br />dock rights. He thinks everyone now needs to understand that is what the language says. He hopes the <br />solution is to come from the people on Big Island to bring to the Council, rather than the Council <br />imposing something that will impact families that have been there forever. If he were those families that <br />have the dock today but may not tomorrow, the only way they will have permanent potential access it to <br />have a code rewritten that gives everyone in the interior land on Big Island potential access to that dock. <br />He said this is just theoretical but it would be a group application such as on Crystal Bay where people <br />have a license to put a dock every year and they apply for it as it is public land. He believes there is a <br />code issue that needs to be addressed by all of the interiors including the family that has the permit today, <br />because it can be gone tomorrow, which they all found out based on the language. He hopes they can get <br />together and bring something that would work for everyone to the City Council so they do not have to <br />impose something on the families that have been out there for a long time. <br /> <br />Crosby asked how many in the audience are in the chambers for this particular issue by raising of hands. <br /> <br />Walsh noted it is just about everyone. <br /> <br />Crosby thinks Walsh made an excellent suggestion. <br /> <br />Johnson was suspicious the reason the permit was written that way is so not one person can control it – <br />just because someone was there first does not entitle one the privilege to what all taxpayers actually own. <br /> <br />Walsh noted nobody has rights to City land and that is exactly why it was written that way. It brings up <br />an opportunity as there are just a few parcels that need to solve this. He hopes they can come up with a <br />solution and work together to bring this forward. <br /> <br />Johnson replied it was written that way to be sure it was revisited if there was another interested party in <br />using it. <br /> <br />Crosby asked what year the permit was granted. <br /> <br />Seals replied it was 1986. <br /> <br />Johnson likes asking the community to work together to find a solution that works. <br /> <br />Walsh would not be in favor of granting any permit tonight – he would either put it off or deny it – and <br />then revisit it knowing the family that has it, the flag has been raised, this is not a permanent dock <br />whether one puts a dock there or not. There is not a permanent right to it and everyone knows it now, so <br />let’s solve it and fix it. He noted the Council is not going to impose something on one person that is not <br />going to work for everyone. Rather, they want it to work for everyone because it is a small community <br />out there. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.