My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-22-2020 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2020
>
06-22-2020 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/1/2020 11:19:11 AM
Creation date
12/1/2020 11:16:50 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
95
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
FILE #LA 20-000003 <br />February 18, 2020 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br /> <br />Lot 3 changing the standards and setbacks to the proposed lots. Currently the lots are not <br />identified as lakeshore lots. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission should provide feedback whether or not some flexibility from <br />identifying the front lot for Lot 3 along the Outlot A will be supported. <br /> <br />Natural Environment. <br />For the Preliminary Plat a determination of the floodplain, wetlands, top of bank and bluff for <br />the property will be required. These areas are to be preserved and protected. A wetland <br />delineation will be required and approved by MCWD. Long Lake Creek is a main waterway to <br />the lake. Further analysis of the project with regard to shoreland management may yield <br />additional comments. The applicant has stated there will no grading south of the proposed cul- <br />de-sac where the creek crossing, wetlands, floodplain, steep slopes and woods areas exist. The <br />grading plan, once developed, will need to be further evaluated to ensure that this goal can be <br />met. <br /> <br />A Long Lake Creek runs through the property, running from the pond in Lot 2 toward Long Lake. <br />Depending on the identified top of bank all three proposed lots could be affected by the 100’ <br />creek setback. This creek is considered a tributary, and the 100 lake yard applies from the top of <br />bank if the lots are served by septic systems. The watershed districts comments may influence <br />changes to the plan. The applicant is stating no work is being proposed in the wetlands, creek, <br />floodplain and steep slopes. A Wetland Delineation and a NOD from the MCWD will be <br />required. <br /> <br />City Code requires conservation design for projects either greater than 5 acres, or at densities <br />greater than one unit per 2 acres. A Conservation design plan will be required, unless waived by <br />the City Council. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission should discuss support a waiver of the conservation design requirement <br />in lieu of identifying substantial trees (Oaks, Maple, Basswood, etc. greater than 6’ DBH). <br /> <br />Engineer Comments <br />The following are comments given by the City Engineer to be addressed with a preliminary plat. <br />1. Private Roadway- A maximum of two properties are allowed to share a driveway. The <br />proposed roadway should be extended to a point to allow the homes to the south to <br />access it directly without a shared drive. As currently depicted three houses would share <br />driveway south of the proposed cul-de-sac. <br />2. Private Roadway- a roadway and cul-de-sac conforming to City standards will need to be <br />constructed in Outlot A. <br />3. Sanitary- Property is within the MUSA and therefor eligible to connect to city sanitary <br />sewer. Applicant should explore the possibility of constructing a low pressure system to <br />serve the properties included in the sketch plan. The closest connection is to the south <br />and would require easements to cross private property. <br />4. Any existing easements on the property should be shown. <br />5. All existing structures on the property should be shown such as the dam and Creek <br />crossing. <br />6. Extent of the wetlands/ creek flood plain should be depicted
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.