Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, April 13, 2015 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />__________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 10 of 40 <br /> <br />(5. #14-3700 AMEND CITY CODE SECTION 78-1379, SMALL WIND CONVERSION <br />SYSTEMS (WECS) – FINAL REVIEW – ORDINANCE NO. 142 continued) <br /> <br />Levang stated that seems rather straight forward and that the City currently requires a homeowner every <br />so often to demonstrate that they have had their septic system pumped. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated there are also specific systems that require regular maintenance and that the requirement <br />helps to ensure the homeowner keeps the contract in effect and reports to the City or has their contractor <br />report to the City. <br /> <br />Council Member Walsh stated in his view the inspection is a great idea. Walsh stated he is glad the <br />Council has reached this point and that the Council probably overreached previously by banning turbines. <br />Walsh stated he agrees with the Mayor and Council Member Cornick that unless it is measurable, it <br />probably should not be there since the City will likely always have to deal with it if someone challenges <br />it. <br /> <br />Walsh stated in his view a minimum of ten acres is an overreach and that he is not in agreement with that <br />requirement. Walsh indicated he likes the idea about the maintenance issue and that perhaps every couple <br />of years the property owner could get an engineer to inspect the system to ensure that everything is in <br />order. Walsh stated the one big thing that is overreaching is the ten acres and that in his view five acres <br />would be more prudent and defensible whether it is in court or explaining the ordinance to somebody. <br /> <br />McMillan asked if the Council would like to craft some maintenance language right now so a vote can be <br />taken on the ordinance tonight. <br /> <br />Levang asked if it would be best to include that language under Item 4(a)(3). Gaffron stated in his view <br />that is the correct place and that the current language reads as follows: Maintenance, SWECS shall be <br />maintained under an agreement or contract by the manufacturer or other qualified entity, and that they <br />could add language to the effect that the property owner shall annually submit an inspection report every <br />two years by a qualified professional regarding the status of the SWECS. <br /> <br />Walsh asked if an inspection should be every year or every two years. Walsh suggested it say qualified <br />licensed professional. <br />Gaffron stated he cannot point to a standard to provide a recommendation on how often the inspection <br />should be done. <br /> <br />McMillan stated she would say every two years. <br /> <br />Walsh stated in his view every year would be too much. <br /> <br />Cornick indicated he is okay with two years. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated the language could say the property owner shall submit an inspection report every two <br />years by a qualified licensed professional to inspect and report on the status of the WECS system. <br /> <br />Walsh stated he agrees with all the other premises of the ordinance except for the ten acres since it will be <br />hard to defend. <br />City Council Meeting April 27, 2015 Page 12 of 257