Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, April 13, 2015 <br />7:00 o’clock p.m. <br />__________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 9 of 40 <br /> <br />(5. #14-3700 AMEND CITY CODE SECTION 78-1379, SMALL WIND CONVERSION <br />SYSTEMS (WECS) – FINAL REVIEW – ORDINANCE NO. 142 continued) <br /> <br />Levang stated to see a structure 45 feet in the air would be very obvious to anyone driving down the street <br />or in their neighborhood and that the Council is very careful about the unintended consequences of these <br />structures. <br /> <br />Levang stated the shadow flicker issue is a difficult issue since it is not so easy to measure or obtain a <br />report, and that she would want to keep that requirement but perhaps change the language to make it <br />easier to obtain. Levang indicated she feels comfortable with the ordinance that they have and that the <br />Council has not knee-jerked on this ordinance but has been very thoughtful and careful with the <br />ordinance. <br /> <br />Council Member Cornick stated in regards to the shadow flicker report, he is in agreement with the <br />Mayor and that it might be something that cannot be measured accurately. Cornick stated after studying <br />this issue for quite a while, he had an afterthought after reading the maintenance portion. Cornick asked <br />if it would be wise to include the requirement for an annual or biannual inspection to ensure compliance. <br />Cornick noted the City inspects kennels and septic systems, and that in his view this might be something <br />that would need to be inspected. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated under the existing language, SWECS shall be maintained under agreement or contract with <br />the manufacturer or other qualified entity. Gaffron stated the question is what kind of things would Staff <br />be expected to inspect. Gaffron indicated he is not sure if Staff is qualified to perform that inspection. <br />Cornick asked if it is something that could be subcontracted by the City. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated that is possible and that it probably would be easier than finding someone to do a shadow <br />flicker report. <br /> <br />Cornick stated his concern is with someone that has a turbine up for five years and it goes through a <br />tornado or a wind storm and it is damaged. Cornick asked how the City would become aware of a <br />situation like that. Cornick stated the owner could leave it in a damaged condition and it will eventually <br />become a rusty hulk. Cornick stated in his view it cries out for some sort of inspection, whether it is <br />annual or biannual. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated he does not have any specific thoughts on that but that Staff could look at what it would <br />cost to perform that annual inspection. <br /> <br />McMillan stated on commercial properties it will likely be a liability issue since there likely will be <br />people walking around and that the business owner would want to ensure those customers are safe. <br /> <br />Gaffron stated another option that is required for certain types of septic systems is that the homeowner <br />has a contract for maintenance and that they are required to report to the City on a regular basis. Gaffron <br />stated if the intent is to have an inspection by a qualified person, the City could require that the report be <br />turned in on a regular basis, which would provide information on the status of the wind turbine. <br /> <br />Cornick stated he would prefer to stick with an already current type of process rather than going through a <br />special process. Cornick stated he likes the option suggested by Mr. Gaffron. <br />City Council Meeting April 27, 2015 Page 11 of 257