Laserfiche WebLink
Exhibit F FILE#05-3136 <br /> ` 17 February 2006 <br /> Page 1 of 5 <br /> Date Ap�lication Received: 06-22-05 <br /> Date Application Considered as Complete: 07-01-OS <br /> 60-Day Review Period Expires: 09-01-OS <br /> Initial 60-Day E�tension by Staff to: 11-01-OS <br /> Extended by applicant on 10-18-OS to: 1-1-06 <br /> Exteiided by applicant on 11-8-OS to: 5-8-06(6 months) <br /> To: Chair Rahn and P1aruling Commission Members <br /> Ron Moorse, City Administrator <br /> From: Mike Gaffron, Plamiing Direct ' <br /> =� <br /> Date: February 17, 2006 <br /> Subject: OS-3136, Troy Broitzman, 1860 Shoreline Drive - Revised Application <br /> - Average Setback Variance -Lot Width Variance <br /> - Public Hearing <br /> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- <br /> Zoning District: LR-lA, One Family Lakeshore Residential, 2-acres/200' <br /> Lot Area: 1.9 acre (83,222 s.£) <br /> Lot Width: 133' <br /> Application Summary: The applicant has submitted revised building and site plans after <br /> a number of discussions with staff during the past few months. The volume of fill and <br /> grading has been reduced to a net balance below 500 cubic yards (356 cy of fill will be <br /> brought to the site), eliminating the need for a land alteration CUP. Cotulcil in October <br /> reviewed a revised plan, and referred the application back to Plaruiing Commission. <br /> Applicant has since submitted a variety of revisions, the most recent of wluch is attached <br /> for review. (The lot width variance, while approvable administratively if all other zoning <br /> requirements are met, is essentially a tecluiicality here because of the average setback <br /> request, and PC has previously recommended a proval of the lot width variance.) <br /> Staff Recommendation: Staff recornmends approval of the lot width variance. Staff <br /> recozrunends approval of the average setback variance, subject to confirmation that the <br /> neighbors clo not object to the proposed house location. Staff finds that the tliresholds <br /> established in the Zoning Code for requiring a land alteration CUP are not surpassed with <br /> this proposal, hence no such CUP is required. <br /> List of Exhibits <br /> Exhibit A - Revised Site Plan <br /> Exhibit B - Revised Building Ploor Plans and Elevations <br /> Exhibit C - Revised Cut & Fill Calculltions, Hardcover Calculations <br /> Exhibit D - Council Action Notice of October 12, 2005 <br /> Exhibit � - PC Minutes of 9-19-OS <br /> Exhibit F - Council Minutes oI'9-26-OS and 10-10-OS <br /> Exhibit G - Airphoto Showing Adjacent IIonle Relationships <br /> Exhibit H - City Engineer Conunents Dated 2-9-06 <br /> Exhibit I - Council Memo and Selected�xhibits of 10-5-OS <br /> 1 <br />