Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,December 9,2019 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> Barnhart stated if that is the direction of the City Council,he has the resolution in draft form and Number <br /> 2 could be stricken and the words"Lake Minnetonka Conservation District"added. <br /> Johnson and Seals agreed with Barnhart's suggestion. <br /> Johnson moved, Crosby seconded,to approve LA18-000094—Lakewest Development o/b/o Russel <br /> Kocon And Jacqueline Gibney,3570 Ivy Place—Conditional Use Permit For Permanent Dock— <br /> Resolution as written, removing number 2 and adding the LMCD language on number 3.VOTE: <br /> Ayes 5, nays 0. <br /> 23. LA19-000074—WILLIAM GRIFFITH O/B/O THEODORE BONNETT,40 & 45 SMITH <br /> AVENUE,REQUEST FOR STREET VACATION <br /> Staff presented a summary of packet memorandum. <br /> Walsh stated his understanding is there are two issues. First,putting the cul-de-sac in the right place <br /> according to Staff because it is the right topography, et cetera. <br /> Barnhart said he supports this location for the cul-de-sac. <br /> Walsh asked whether it was because it was flatter. <br /> Barnhart said primarily it meets the City's needs. There is not a lot of benefit from pushing it farther to the <br /> north, other than it's closer to the trail extension. <br /> Crosby asked what the negatives would be regarding pushing it farther to the north. <br /> Barnhart said he did not think the applicant would support it there and would likely withdraw the <br /> application and then a hammerhead would be put within the City's Right-of-Way. He thinks a cul-de-sac <br /> is desired long-term versus a hammerhead. <br /> Walsh stated the current easement pathway has a steep embankment to deal with and it would be a lot of <br /> work to make that path work. The easier pathway is the one already there because it's very easy to walk <br /> from a pitch standpoint. He would like to get the best trail and a permanent easement. The applicant is <br /> proposing a 10-foot path, Staff is saying it should be 20 feet, and he asked for more information from <br /> Staff. <br /> Barnhart stated 20 feet is a standard trail width requirement which allows the City to build an 8-10-foot- <br /> wide trail and allows maintenance work to be done within an easement without encroaching on other <br /> property. A 10-foot easement makes it pretty tight. <br /> Walsh said if there is only 10 feet,the pathway could only be about 4-5 feet because you have to build <br /> and maintain it from the edges and work within the easement. <br /> Crosby noted you would be working within the area you have. <br /> Walsh asked if there is another number that would work if 10 is too small and 20 is too much. <br /> Page 8 of 34 <br />