Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,December 9,2019 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> The City Council took no action on this item. <br /> FINANCE DIRECTOR REPORT <br /> 22. ADOPT THE 2020 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN <br /> Olson said the Capital Improvement Plan is for the long-range maintenance,repair, and replacement of <br /> the City's infrastructure which ranges from vehicles and plow trucks to roads. The plan was talked about <br /> in-depth at a work session. It is a planning document only, and anything that is approved would have to <br /> come back to the Council for approval again. <br /> Walsh stated it is a general plan of what the City is doing for the next 5-8 years so the City can budget <br /> and get funding. <br /> Seals referenced Long Lake Fire and confirmed that it is a planning document and everything still has to <br /> come through the City Council even though the biggest expense does not hit until 2028. <br /> Printup moved, Crosby seconded,to adopt the 2020 Capital Improvement Plan.VOTE: Ayes 5, <br /> nays 0. <br /> 15. LA18-000094—LAKEWEST DEVELOPMENT OB/O RUSSEL KOCON AND <br /> JACQUELINE GIBNEY,3570 IVY PLACE—CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR <br /> PERMANENT DOCK—RESOLUTION NO. 7061 <br /> Johnson said he pulled the item because the description did not include the LMCD, as far as whose <br /> jurisdiction the dock had to meet. It referenced the DNR and Watershed District, and the LMCD would <br /> have jurisdiction on the dock itself. <br /> Walsh stated either way the applicant would have to get their approval. <br /> Johnson said there is language included that gave a specific distance for reflectors on the permanent dock. <br /> He did not feel the City Council should decide what the correct spacing for reflectors is and should rely <br /> on the LMCD to have ordinances about permanent docks. <br /> Walsh asked for confirmation that the LMCD has ordinances for reflectors on permanent docks. <br /> Barnhart said he is not certain if they do. He stated the language is a mirror of a condition at Shadywood <br /> from a couple years earlier. He suggested adding "at least every 25 feet" so that if the LMCD has a more <br /> stringent requirement,that application would apply. <br /> Seals suggested using language of"reflectors should follow the LMCD code" so the City does not impose <br /> on the LMCD's business, adding that the City would not be inspecting it. <br /> Crosby agreed with Seals. <br /> Mattick said it would not need to be added if the LMCD has a code on it. <br /> Page 7 of 34 <br />