My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-09-2019 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2019
>
12-09-2019 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2020 5:07:19 PM
Creation date
1/16/2020 5:07:14 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> Monday,December 9,2019 <br /> 6:30 o'clock p.m. <br /> Barnhart said the City's standard is 20 but Staff could make do with what the Council supports, <br /> recognizing there's challenges to a 4-foot wide trail within a 10-foot easement from a maintenance <br /> standpoint. If it was a brand-new trail easement, Staff would want at least 20 feet. <br /> Walsh said this plan would clean up the road and creates a permanent and better pathway. <br /> Seals said neighbors have used the phrase "equitable exchange of land" and asked for clarification. <br /> Barnhart stated if you take the area that will be vacated, it is substantially larger than the area the <br /> applicant is proposing to provide in terms of the cul-de-sac and the easement. <br /> Seals asked how Barnhart defined "substantially." <br /> Barnhart said the amount of land to be vacated is about 29,900 square feet. The amount of property the <br /> applicants would be providing is about 3,400 square feet. From an equality perspective, not all square <br /> footage is the same. The fingers are heavily wooded;there's some questionable topography to deal with. <br /> What the applicant is proposing is land that impacts their ability to improve their property, so there is <br /> some value to the property owner in that respect. There is some value to the City for the cul-de-sac. While <br /> it is a little more than 10%of the total,he is not looking at it strictly square foot to square foot. <br /> Seals said it did not make a lot of sense to her. One of the residents that called her said the City <br /> sometimes complicates things and that the current road works. From what some of the neighbors are <br /> saying, it does not seem equitable. While she does not think there needs to be an exact square footage to <br /> square footage because the land is different, it seems like a drastic difference. <br /> Walsh stated the problem is,there is a big hillside of a sliver of land and you can't vacate part of it. <br /> Seals commented that there may be a value on it. <br /> Crosby said he'd like to see what the neighbors'thoughts and comments are and who showed up tonight. <br /> Walsh asked what Seals meant by "value" and where she was going with that. <br /> Seals stated if the City is going to give up a big chunk of land that is a value to a resident,maybe there is <br /> a number on it. It's a dangerous thing to get into,where the City of Orono gives away land for free. She <br /> knows this isn't for free,but it does not pass the sniff test of being equitable. She agreed it would be good <br /> to hear from the residents. <br /> Johnson asked, if the cul-de-sac is put in as proposed, is the City putting the two houses out of <br /> compliance with the required setback. <br /> Barnhart said the cul-de-sac encroaches into one yard. <br /> Johnson said it goes into the other property, too, unless the drawing received by the Council members <br /> isn't an accurate depiction. <br /> Barnhart stated the drawing he is working from is in the packet. It encroaches into one but does not touch <br /> the other property. <br /> Page 9 of 34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.