Laserfiche WebLink
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
• <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 18, 1996 <br />( #IB - #2198 John O'Sullivan and North Central CBA - Continued) <br />Thompson said the only way to reduce hardcover was with the parking variance. <br />Lindquist saw less parking with more pond as a better option but was unable to render a <br />judgment without further information on the pond and how it will work. He asked that <br />detailed information be provided when the application is next reviewed. O'Sullivan <br />inquired if the runoff with the pond and flowing to outlot C was not in the 500 -1000' <br />setback. Lindquist said the Commission would have to look at the whole area and would <br />require the study of the City Engineer. Thompson reiterated that the pond would not <br />accommodate the development of both sites. He noted they were working with the <br />MCWD regarding the pond and a possible monetary contribution for the deficiency. <br />Lindquist asked that the applicant continue working with the MCWD and Staff. <br />O'Sullivan also added that the parking setback is no different than what is currently <br />happening on his other site now. O'Sullivan noted that there is a good area in which to <br />enhance the green space and will work with the County. Lindquist agreed that it would be <br />better to provide more green space. <br />Lindquist moved, Hawn seconded, to table Application #2198 to the January meeting of <br />the Planning Commission. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />ACTION ITEMS <br />• #2 #2180 PEGGY AND FRANK PICHELMAN 2920 A - <br />( ) C SCO POINT ROAD <br />VARIANCES - CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC HEARING 7:00 -7:29 P.M. <br />The applicants were present. <br />Mabusth indicated that this application was tabled at the last Planning Commission <br />meeting to allow for further review. The plan includes two options regarding placement <br />of the 24x'24' garage addition to the street side. Option 1 proposes the doors to face <br />outward 8' from the lot line. Option 2 would include the driveway over the street yard. <br />Additions proposed to the rear include a level expansion and grade level deck. These <br />improvements meet the average lakeshore setback. Mabusth reported that the neighbors <br />are concerned with an expansion within the street yard inconsistent with other homes in <br />the neighborhood. The applicant was asked to work with the neighbors in revisiting the <br />proposed plan. <br />• <br />