Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 18, 1996 <br />( #2 - #2180 Peggy and Frank Pichelman - Continued) <br />The amended plan locates all improvements within the legal building envelope of the <br />property. All structures meet the required setbacks. A tuck -under garage meets the 30' <br />setback. The 4' expansion along the side of the residence meets the 10' side setback. A <br />structural expansion 12'x20' is proposed along the lake side corner of the residence. The 3 <br />level expansion is proposed at 16'x20' and 12'x15'. Structural and hardcover variances <br />would be required. There is a reduction in structural coverage from the original proposal <br />of 18.4% to 17.1 %. There is a significant hardcover increase at 41% for a 15.8% <br />variance. The hardcover in the 75 -250' setback area in the original proposal was at 36.7% <br />for option 1 and 39.6% for option 2. The existing structural hardcover is 33.4 %. <br />The amended plan will result in the removal of the structure while maintaining the walls., <br />Mabusth indicated that the proposal is nearly a rebuild by the redesign within the building <br />envelope. Mabusth alluded to a letter from the neighbors, the Powell's, regarding their <br />concerns with the improvements. <br />The applicant stated that they attempted to answer the questions brought forward by the <br />neighbors to meet the setbacks. This resulted in the garage being pulled back into the <br />house envelope. <br />During public comments, Robert Powell, 2916 Casco Point Road, questioned the effect on <br />• <br />runoff with the ground cover. He noted that water comes into their basement after <br />rainfall. Powell said he was satisfied with the design if it does not negatively affect the <br />drainage situation in the area. <br />• <br />Lindquist inquired if this issue was addressed. Pichelman said he did not wish for water in <br />his basement either. It was noted that drain tile would be added to assist the Pichelman's <br />drainage. Mabusth said the drainage issue will be reviewed by the City Engineer. <br />Lindquist asked that the condition be added to include the City Engineer review of this <br />drainage issue. Mrs. Powell reported that the contractor did review the drainage issue. <br />The design is such that runoff will be taken around the front of their home and downward <br />towards the lake so as not to trap water anywhere. The lower level ground is level. <br />McMillan asked if gutters would be placed on the new structure and instructed the <br />residents to ensure that the property is properly sloped. Pichelman reported that both the <br />existing home and new structure will have gutters. He added they are attempting to solve <br />the problem of drainage between the two homes. <br />9 <br />