My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-18-1996 Planning Commission Minutes
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
11-18-1996 Planning Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2019 2:10:29 PM
Creation date
7/10/2019 2:10:27 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 18, 1996 <br />( 91B - 92198 John O'Sullivan and North Central CBA - Continued) <br />Berg inquired if the parking setback was from the sidewalk. Gaffron said there would be a <br />4' green space. The sidewalk is located into the right -of -way. Normally there would be a <br />20' yard in other uses. <br />McMillan asked where the stormwater would go. Gaffron said it would travel from the <br />Culver's site to the pond. It has been determined that the pond as proposed will not meet <br />the standards to serve both Phase I and Phase II. The runoff travels from the site to the <br />wetland areas and on to Lafayette Bay. <br />Lindquist inquired whether the hardcover calculations were fairly accurate. O'Sullivan . <br />said they were with the possibility of a slight reduction. <br />Lindquist inquired about the proposed height of the building. Thompson estimated with <br />the modification to a smaller footprint and to achieve the look they desire, the peak would <br />encroach 5' beyond the 30' restriction. It was noted that it would be lower than what the <br />church currently in height. <br />Mabusth asked if there would be filling from the existing site to maintain the pad. <br />Thompson said only a little fill would be required. <br />•Thompson noted that the hardcover overages in the two zones were to the outside <br />perimeter. He noted that the intent of the hardcover is to eliminate direct runoff. The <br />area does not drain to the two bays that define the hardcover zones and the pond will <br />serve as best as allowed. He did not feel the 500 -1000' zoning restrictions applied since <br />the runoff does not drain to those portions of the lake. Lindquist agreed but only if the <br />pond was large enough. <br />is <br />Lindquist said he saw no concern with the height as proposed. He felt the 4' parking <br />setback was too excessive. He noted the hardcover would be dependent on the pond. <br />Hawn and McMillan agreed. <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.