Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 18, 1995 <br />0 <br />( #5 - #2059 Minnehaha Creek Watershed District - Continued) <br />Rowlette questioned item A on the handout and asked what would happen if the Medina <br />project was not completed prior to the Orono project. LaBounty said it would be <br />sufficient to condition Orono's approval on the completion of the Deerhill Road project. <br />LaBounty said he would furnish an artist's rendition of the revegetation and will meet with <br />Pearce. <br />Vote: Ayes 6, Nays 0. <br />The Planning Commissioners asked to schedule a joint meeting with the Council regarding <br />this project. <br />(#6) #2060 TIM FEYO AND KAREN FULLER -FEYO, 4055 ELM STREET - <br />VARIANCE RENEWAL - PUBLIC HEARING 9:40 -9:55 P.M. <br />The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. <br />Gaffron noted that the application was for a renewal of a lot area variance previously <br />• granted in 1978, 1980, and 1994. The property is located in the LR -1B single family <br />lakeshore residential zoning district requiring 1 acre on Elm Street, west of Tonkawa. A <br />54% variance for lot area is requested for the .46 acre lot. The lot meets the lot width <br />requirement as it contains 118'or 84% of the 140' standard, where 80% or 112' is required <br />for existing lots of record. <br />Gaffron reported that the three lots were combined into one parcel and received approval <br />of a conceptual footprint in 1994 with 10' side setback, 30' rear, and 35' front setback. <br />The grading plan showing the driveway meets the satisfaction of the Engineer. Concern <br />with the grading is from direct runoff traveling downhill. A proposed downspout and <br />underground the will direct drainage to the road ditch at the front of the lot, from which it <br />flows to North Arm. <br />Peterson received confirmation that there are no changes to the application, and it is a <br />renewal application only. Peterson inquired of the applicant if it was their intention to do <br />anything with the property. Feyo said it is their intention to sell or build. The Feyo's are <br />in the process of securing loans. It was noted that the shed belonging to the neighbor is <br />still located on the Feyo property. <br />Schroeder inquired if there was a lot line problem. Gaffron said the shed still exists over <br />the lot line and the neighbors still disagree. Schroeder asked that the lot line be located <br />and stipulate the location of the shed. <br />15 <br />