Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 18, 1995 <br />• <br />( #6 - #2060 Tim Feyo and Karen Fuller -Feyo - Continued) <br />Peterson said regarding this survey dispute, his position is to look at the survey submitted <br />by the applicant as the one by which to gauge the application. A neighbor's survey would <br />only be considered if it differed from the one supplied by the applicant. <br />During public comments, Herman Laue said he is concerned with drainage, hardcover, and <br />the lot line issue. He said he is working on a survey and may pursue a Torrens action in <br />order to settle the lot line dispute. Peterson commented that Laue has not to date shown <br />by documentation any discrepancy with the survey done by the applicant. <br />Rowlette moved, Smith seconded, to approve the renewal of Application #2060 with the <br />same conditions previously laid out. <br />Gaffron noted receipt of two letters from neighbors, Laue and Wiley, opposing the <br />renewal of the application, which were read into the minutes and are part of the <br />application package. <br />Another letter from Mr. Wroblewski, 630 Park Lane, neighbor down hill from Laue, <br />opposes the renewal due to a concern with runoff from stormwater. It is his opinion that <br />• the increase in hardcover would add to the runoff problem and cause erosion to the public <br />access. Schroeder commented that any home built on the property would have to have an <br />approved drainage plan that met City code. Peterson noted that this was a case of dispute <br />between neighbors. <br />Gaffiron clarified conditions previously stated regarding legal combination of the lots, <br />setback and hardcover requirements, and detailed grading plans showing driveway and any <br />tree removal, and retaining walls. <br />Vote: Ayes 6, Nays 0. Motion carried. <br />( #7) #2061 ARNE WASBERG, 3135 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - VARIANCE <br />RENEWAL - PUBLIC HEARING 10:00 -10:02 P.M. <br />The Certificate of Mailing and Affidavit of Publication were noted. <br />Weckman reported that the application was for a variance renewal, which expired <br />September 12, 1995. <br />The applicant was not present. <br />• There were no public comments. <br />16 <br />