My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-19-1974 Planning Commission Meeting
Orono
>
Agendas, Minutes & Packets
>
Planning Commission
>
Minutes
>
1970-1979
>
1974
>
08-19-1974 Planning Commission Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2019 2:29:31 PM
Creation date
7/9/2019 2:29:31 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING HELD AUGUST 19, 1974 Page 3 <br />explained that placing 54 residences in an SUBDIVISION, <br />isolated area as this, with on -site systems TMG Investment <br />would only pave the way fora sewer project (Continued) <br />of astronomical costs through undeveloped <br />propeaty. T,Ir. Berman agreed to.submit a <br />revised plat. <br />Kullberg moved, Curtis seconded, that the VARIANCE <br />variance petition of David Maiser, 498 Park 498 Park Lane <br />Lane, be deferred until he presents himself <br />to answer questions. Aiotion, Ayes (7) - Nays (0). <br />Kullberg moved, Curtis seconded, that the <br />variance petition of Les Raskob, 860 Dakota <br />Avenue, be deferred until he presents himself <br />to answer questions. Motion, Ayes (7) - Nays (0).. <br />The chairman, noting there were many people <br />in audience, asked if they wished to be heard <br />on any matter. Mr. & Mrs. Frank Rheinhardt, <br />ktrr. & Mrs. Dick Oliver and Mr. & Mrs. Howard <br />White said they were there to protest the <br />proposed parking lot construction on the 60' <br />public access at Sandy Beach. Their complaint <br />was that there was an over -usage of the site <br />presently and this would only compound it. <br />It was explained to them this was no function <br />of the Planning Commission and the matter <br />would be heard by the Park.Commission. <br />Van Nest presented to all members policy <br />recommendations concerning subdividing land <br />containing privately owned common land, before <br />referred to as "outlots ". The policy and <br />rationale read as follows: <br />Policy: Each lot in future subdivisions shall <br />meet all requirements of the Zoning Code <br />concerning, but not limited to, minimum lost <br />size and width. Substandard lots in size and <br />width can only be plotted for purposes of <br />public dedication. Therefore, "outlots" <br />shall not be permitted in any future land <br />subdivision. <br />T.ati =scale: 1. "outlots" are not created for <br />single family dwellings and are not therefore, <br />presently a permitted -or conditional use in any <br />residential use district. <br />At any future time, the Planning Commission <br />.r Council may determine that "outlots" would <br />be desirable in a particular residential "use <br />district. At that time, "outlots" may be <br />added as a conditional use with such restrictions <br />and conditions as deemed proper by amending the <br />nonir_g Code. <br />(Continued) <br />VARIANCE <br />860 Dakota Avenue <br />i <br />SANDY BEACH`COMPLAINT <br />OUTLOTS <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.