Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING HELD AUGUST 19, 1974 <br />Kullberg moved, Hake seconded, that the <br />addition be allowed 8' from the, front.--... <br />?roperty line in alignment with'the present <br />residence, conditioned on reducing any <br />excessive hard cover on both sides of the <br />road due to proximity to the lake. Motion, <br />Ayes (6) - Nays (0). <br />Members studied the preliminary plat for a <br />simple subdivision as presented by John <br />Burger to divide off a parcel from his <br />16 -acre homesite to contruct a residence <br />for his son. Since the lot met the require- <br />ments of the proposed zoning and showed an <br />adequate 50' easement to the property and <br />there was no need for future streets in the <br />araa I <br />Pesek moved, Curtis seconded, that.approval <br />be recommended contingent on approved <br />percolation tests. Motion, Ayes (7) - <br />Nays (0) . <br />T110 Investment was represented by Frank <br />Berman in a presentation of a preliminary <br />, <br />to divide Parcels 1185 . •1525, 4520, <br />4510, 3500 & 2500 in Sec. 30 & 31 into <br />54 lots and one outlot. The engineer's <br />report was read recommending:- <br />1. All preliminary plats should be in accord <br />with the Comprehensive Plan for the City: <br />2. Preliminary street showing present grade, <br />proposed grade (every 1001) complete with per- <br />of grade and showing satisfactory disposition <br />of storm water. <br />3. Proposed building setback line on all lots. <br />4. Names of adjacent property owners. <br />5. The maximum length of a cul -de -sac has been <br />set by the City's building Code.- Preliminary <br />street layouts must comply with this code. <br />A further study of the plat, and also site <br />reviews by members showed there was much marsh <br />area being divided. Van Nest explained the <br />rationale behind Ordinance No. 125 and a copy <br />was given to Mr. Berman along with a check list <br />for requirements for a preliminary plat.. <br />`_scussion now centered around the proposed <br />give -acre zoning for this area versus the one - <br />acre platti..g proposed by TMG. Van Nest <br />(Continued) <br />Page 2 <br />VARIANCE <br />1983 Fagernes''s Point Rd. <br />(Continued) <br />SUBDIVISION <br />3700 Bayside Road <br />SUBDIVISION <br />TMG Investment <br />Sixth Avenue North & <br />#12 <br />