My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-11-2018 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2018
>
06-11-2018 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2019 12:25:15 PM
Creation date
5/24/2019 11:50:51 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
669
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, May 21, 2018 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />Ressler stated as a variance applicant from two years ago, he had no idea who some of the people were <br />that were on the list. Ressler stated 350 feet goes a long way when the property is on the lake or in a <br />smaller lot neighborhood. Ressler noted the applicants are also required to post signs that say they are <br />applying for a permit. Ressler stated unless there is an epidemic of people saying they have not been <br />informed, he does not see the need to increase the area. <br />Landgraver noted there have been instances where people did get the notice but still said they were not <br />informed about it. Landgraver stated there will always be instances of people asking why someone did <br />not tell them about it and that he is in agreement with Chair Thiesse that the City should follow the state <br />guidelines. Landgraver questioned what the return on the investment will be, noting that more people <br />offering opinions on something, especially when it comes to a small project, might not always be the best. <br />Lemke stated increasing it to 500 feet is not going to guarantee people will pay attention to the notice. <br />Landgraver stated the most pushback he remembers for not receiving notice was the Dayton property off <br />of County Road 6. Landgraver asked whether Staff have the discretion to expand it. <br />Curtis stated Staff does not expand it because they do not want to make a decision on one project versus <br />another. Curtis stated on larger projects they will erect a City sign. <br />Chair Thiesse opened the public hearing at 7:45 p.m. <br />There were no public comments regarding this application. <br />Chair Thiesse closed the public hearing at 7:45 p.m. <br />Lemke moved, Ressler seconded, to recommend denial of Application No. LA18-000042, City of <br />Orono Text Amendment: Notification Distance for Public Hearings. VOTE: Ayes 7, Nays 0. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.