My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-11-2018 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2018
>
06-11-2018 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/24/2019 12:25:15 PM
Creation date
5/24/2019 11:50:51 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
669
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Monday, May 21, 2018 <br />6:30 o'clock p.m. <br />Council <br />LA18-000042 <br />Exhibit E <br />6. LA18-000042 CITY OF ORONO, TEXT AMENDMENT — PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE <br />DISTANCE AND SUBDIVISION REQUIREMENTS, 7:34 P.M. — 7:45 P.M. <br />Oakden stated Staff was requested to look at changing the notice requirements for a public hearing. <br />Currently notices are sent to property owners 350 feet from the subject property. The Mayor proposes <br />500 feet. State Statute requires notification of property owners within 350 feet for zoning ordinance <br />amendments. Within the zoning and subdivision chapters, the City also requires a public hearing for all <br />conditional use permits, variances, rezoning requests, comprehensive plan amendments, wetland and <br />subdivision requests. <br />The intent of the notification radii is to inform those property owners that are more likely to be directly <br />impacted by a proposal. All interested parties can learn about the project through the City's official paper <br />or through the City's listserve. Having a larger notification area would increase the change for more <br />public input. <br />The Planning Commission should consider and evaluate the typical amount of public input they receive <br />for public hearing applications and how the residents hear about the projects. Other items to consider <br />include the increased cost for postage and mailings and the impact an application might have on an <br />abutting neighbor versus a neighbor located 500 feet away. <br />Oakden noted she did include some examples in the packet depicting the current notification area and the <br />expanded notification area. <br />Landgraver asked how this change would impact Staff. Landgraver asked how likely it would be that <br />Staff will be receiving more calls. <br />Oakden stated it is likely Staff will get more calls and that the Planning Commission will receive <br />additional input but that she is not sure of a specific percentage. <br />6. LA18-000042 CITY OF ORONO, TEXT AMENDMENT — PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE <br />DISTANCE AND SUBDIVISION REQUIREMENTS, 7:34 P.M. — 7:45 P.M. — Continued <br />Seals asked if there is any expectation for increased processing time. <br />Oakden stated the notice mailing is provided by the applicant at this time and that there will be some Staff <br />time to print the additional postcards as well as the postage. <br />Libby stated considering lot sizes, in his view the 500 feet would be more inclusive. <br />Thiesse commented he has some difficulty with expanding the notification area and that the City tries <br />hard to get people involved but that it does not always work. Thiesse stated in his view people in the <br />neighborhood have an obligation to know what is going on in their neighborhood. Thiesse stated he likes <br />getting people involved but that he does not like going beyond what the state statute requires. Thiesse <br />noted the City just backed off of their wetland ordinances for that very reason. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.