Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, June 11, 2018 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />14. LA18-14 LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT OB/O BARBARA LUPIENT, ET AL, <br />3508 IVY PLACE, FINAL PLAT AND EVELOPMENT AGREEMENT APPROVAL <br />RESOLUTION 6878 — Continued <br />David Johnson, Attorney -at -Law, stated he is representing Jay and Tara White and that he is asking for <br />this item to be tabled until a couple of issues can be resolved. Johnson stated if the matter is not tabled, <br />he does not believe the City is complying with City Resolution 6789, which was adopted on <br />September 11, 2017, and that it would not be complying with the Development Agreement that is under <br />consideration tonight. <br />Paragraph 2 of the Development Agreement states that the plat cannot be recorded until all conditions are <br />complied with. Paragraph 24A of the Development Agreement states that implementation and adherence <br />to the findings and conditions listed in Resolution 6789 are complied with. Paragraph 14H of the <br />Resolution regards the sewer encroachment and natural gas encroachment that serves the Whites' <br />property. The resolution states in Paragraph 14A that the applicants must grant an easement for the <br />encroachment, which has not happened. Johnson indicated they have had some preliminary <br />conversations, but they have not received an acceptable easement so far. In addition, there are also deck <br />and driveway encroachments referred to in Paragraph I of the same resolution, but nothing has transpired <br />between the Whites and the developer relating to these encroachments. <br />Johnson noted the natural gas line goes beyond the 10 -foot easement area into the plat and that the Whites <br />have a concern that they will need to find another way to serve their property with these utilities. Johnson <br />stated that is why the conditions were made in the preliminary resolution and that the Whites need some <br />assurance that they can permanently rely on an easement for that. Johnson stated it is a reasonable <br />request and that it was considered when the original resolution was passed. If the application is passed <br />tonight unconditionally, it will not be complying with the earlier resolution. <br />Johnson stated there is significant expense for the Whites in connection with these issues. Johnson noted <br />Ivy Place ends at the Whites' property and that access to the new development is through an easement but <br />that they do not believe there is an utility easement there that allows utilities to service this new <br />development and cross the Whites' property. Johnson stated those are the issues that they would like to <br />see resolved. <br />City Attorney Schutt stated she and Soren Mattick have had several discussions with Mr. Johnson trying <br />to clarify these issues and that it appears they are two ships passing in the night. Schutt stated City Staff <br />and her office have reviewed the sewer and water issue, reviewed sketches of the property boundaries and <br />surrounding rights-of-way, and reviewed where the storm and water connections and pipes are within <br />those locations. It is Staff's opinion that the sewer and water lines for this development do not cross the <br />Whites' property except for in places where easements already exist. <br />With respect to the deck and driveway and gas line, Staff did receive as requested a survey of the property <br />showing the locations of any encroachments. It appears from the plans that the deck runs along the <br />property line but does not cross over the property line. Schutt stated that is a private property owner <br />dispute, but City Staff requested the survey so they would know where all the proposed and existing <br />encroachments are. Schutt stated the City would not get involved in a private property dispute of this <br />nature and that the application should not be delayed because of that. <br />Page 7 of 20 <br />