Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, June 11, 2018 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />14. LA18-14 LAKE WEST DEVELOPMENT OB/O BARBARA LUPIENT, ET AL, <br />3508 IVY PLACE, FINAL PLAT AND EVELOPMENT AGREEMENT APPROVAL <br />RESOLUTION 6878 — Continued <br />Walsh stated if there is a private property dispute, the property owners will need to resolve that. <br />Schutt stated it is Staff's position that all those conditions referenced by Mr. Johnson in Resolution No. <br />6789 have been met, which is the reason why those conditions have been removed from the resolution to <br />alleviate any confusion. <br />Johnson stated the Whites are not asking for the City to get involved with the dispute on the <br />encroachments and the driveway but that they relied on the resolution that the easement needs to be <br />completed before the final plat is approved. Johnson stated removing that language does not help them in <br />bringing any sort of legal action to enjoin the plat and that they relied on the resolution and the first <br />Development Agreement that said these are conditions of the Preliminary Plat. <br />Johnson stated they are looking for an easement and that they understand that is a private issue but the <br />proposals for the easement are not acceptable. If there is a removal of the gas or sewer lines, that would <br />be entirely at the expense of the Whites, which would be expensive, and that they are asking that the City <br />follow its original resolution and Development Agreement. <br />Walsh stated what he is hearing is that it is Staff's and legal counsel's opinion that it has been met and <br />that the property owner can always dispute that in court. Walsh stated with that understanding, the City <br />Council can approve the plat as presented. <br />Crosby asked if the City Attorney is comfortable with that position. <br />Schutt indicated she is. <br />Crosby asked what the Whites are looking to gain. <br />Dankey stated they do not want to move their utilities. <br />Walsh stated the easement was something that was done in the 1960s and that there might not be full <br />language in the easement but that there is an easement there. Walsh stated the Whites feel they cannot do <br />this development without a new easement and the developer feels he can bring the utilities in a different <br />way, which could leave the Whites without any utilities. Walsh stated in his view it is more of a trump <br />card that is being used, but that is not the City Council's job to try to figure out what they are trying to get <br />out of it. The City's job is to continue to move the application along unless some blaring legal issue is <br />brought up. <br />Crosby moved, Dankey seconded, to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 6878, a Resolution Approving the <br />Plat of Ivy Place, File No. LA18-000014, and to approve and authorize the Mayor to execute the <br />Development Agreement. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />Page 8 of 20 <br />