Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />Monday, June 11, 2018 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />15. LA18-40 MATTHEW AND ANGELA HOPPING, 95 SMITH AVENUE, CONDITIONAL <br />USE PERMIT AND SECOND DRIVEWAY <br />Curtis stated the applicants are planning to construct a new residence on the property. The grading plan <br />involves the import of approximately 250 cubic yards of material with a total site disturbance of <br />approximately 815 cubic yards. Grading and filling activities in excess of 500 cubic yards require a <br />conditional use permit. <br />The new home is designing to have an upper, main garage facing Smith as well as a lower garage to <br />accommodate their desired number of vehicles on site. They are also requesting approval of a second <br />driveway access onto Smith Avenue to access the lower garage. <br />The Planning Commission held a public hearing, during which time there were neighbors present <br />expressing concerns about the potential for the construction project to adversely impact their narrow <br />street. Following the public and discussion, the Planning Commission voted 7-0 on a motion to approve <br />the requested conditional use permit. The Planning Commission did not discuss or make a <br />recommendation on the second driveway access request. <br />After the public hearing, Staff discussed the neighborhood concerns with the applicants and asked them to <br />consider proactive solutions, including parking restrictions and/or off-street parking during the duration of <br />the project. The applicants have requested the City post the street "no parking" on one side of Smith <br />Avenue in order to maintain an open roadway during the construction. <br />Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit. The Council tonight should direct Staff to draft <br />a resolution regarding the conditional use permit and the second driveway request. <br />Walsh noted the City does not receive a lot of second driveway requests and that it is not a given it will be <br />approved. <br />Curtis stated the grading plan does reflect the second driveway. Curtis indicated she and the City <br />Engineer met with the property owner and discussed their grading plan and their request for the second <br />driveway. Curtis stated she believes the second garage location is important to the property owners. In <br />an attempt to maintain their location within the setbacks on the lot, the applicants' engineer did try to <br />provide a grading plan to utilize one curb cut and get around the house but that he was not able to design <br />anything that is more feasible. <br />Rief noted the elevation drops ten feet in that area. <br />Curtis stated the area is low and that they plan to hold up the fill to access the second driveway with a <br />wall. <br />Walsh asked how many residences are on the road. <br />Curtis stated approximately five. <br />Walsh stated the road is definitely a concern as far as access in and out and that he would like to hear how <br />they can make it as safe as possible. <br />Page 9 of 20 <br />