Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Tuesday, January 22, 2019 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br />Barnhart indicated it is. <br /> <br />Landgraver asked if the lot line could be adjusted between Lots 3 and 4. <br /> <br />Mark Gronberg, Surveyor, stated Lot 4 does not meet it either. Gronberg stated he is aware of at least 15 <br />other applications that do not meet the width requirement. Some of the lot lines can be adjusted to meet <br />the 200 feet but then you would get ugly lot lines, which is why it has not been an issue at the end of a <br />cul-de-sac in the past. <br /> <br />On the lakeshore lot, there is 619 feet of lakeshore. When you measure point to point, one lot is 15 feet <br />short. At the 75-foot setback, all the lots are compliant. At the average lakeshore setback, Gronberg <br />stated they are proposing a straight line between the two adjoining houses. The house to the north is <br />located way across the ravine and the other house further to the north is a lot closer to the lake because the <br />lake curves. Gronberg noted they are 275 feet back from the lake with two of the houses that are being <br />proposed and that they would like to go on that sightline to line the homes up straight. <br /> <br />Barnhart noted the average lakeshore line has no impact on this property. In the past the City has <br />artificially created a setback, but when it comes to the building permit, issues come up. If Lot 4 is <br />developed first, the average lakeshore setback is at one distance. If Lot 5 is developed first, the average <br />lakeshore setback is almost in the road. As a result, the City might want to create an artificial setback line <br />in this situation. Barnhart indicated he is not looking for solutions at this stage. <br /> <br />Barnhart noted Lot 4 does not meet the width requirement. Staff does not measure Lot 4 at the cul-de-sac <br />since Lot 4 is a lake lot and it would be measured at the lake. The average lakeshore setback is something <br />that will need to be looked at. <br /> <br />Thiesse stated the intent of the average lakeshore setback line is to protect lake views. <br /> <br />Barnhart stated that is correct. <br /> <br />Thiesse noted those homes are not impacting any lake views. <br /> <br />Barnhart stated it might become an issue at some point in the future. <br /> <br />Erickson stated he is comfortable with it as proposed, but as it relates to the lot line between Lots 5 and 6, <br />if that was bumped five feet, they would have 201 feet on one side and 190 feet on the other side, which is <br />closer to the requirement. <br /> <br />Gronberg pointed out the 206 feet is along the lakeshore and the other two northerly lots are at the <br />minimum. Gronberg stated it is 200, 200, 185 point to point, and along the actual lakeshore they are all <br />over 200 feet. <br /> <br />Barnhart noted back in 2016 for 800 North Arm, the Planning Commission supported a width variance. <br /> <br />Mike Stedman, Developer, commented this is a very special property and probably one of the last large <br />properties in Orono that offers City sewer and water. The key aspect to the development is the low <br />density and great effort has been made not to impact the wetlands. <br />