Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Tuesday, January 22, 2019 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 1 of 3 <br /> <br /> <br />8. LA18-000095 CHUCK ALCON ON BEHALF OF ERIC AND ANDREA LARSON, 690 <br />BROWN ROAD NORTH, SKETCH PLAN, 8:22 P.M. – 8:42 P.M. <br /> <br />Chuck Alcon, Applicant, and Michael Stedman, Developer, were present. <br /> <br />Barnhart stated the applicants are proposing a sketch plan for a 7-lot single-family residential <br />development on the 24.37-acre parcel. Each of the lots meets the required 2-acre dry buildable <br />requirement for the zoning district. Rezoning is not being proposed. Plat improvements would include <br />extension of the road to serve the seven lots. The property is located in the MUSA and the ordinance <br />requires it to be served by sanitary sewer. <br /> <br />The main question for the Planning commission is two of the lots do not meet the lot width requirement. <br />As noted in the staff report, the width of Lot 3 is based on the distance at the building setback line <br />adjacent to the right-of-way. In this situation it is an arc 50 feet back, which is approximately 143 feet of <br />width by definition. That would be within a 75-foot creek setback. The house, however, will actually be <br />built back further into the property and will be approximately 200 feet back. The strict reading of the rule <br />requires it to be measured at the building setback line. While the lot is large, it does not meet the strict <br />requirements for width. <br /> <br />Lot 6 is a lake lot. In this case width is measured at two locations. One is where the lines intersect at the <br />ordinary high water mark and then the other is 75 feet back from there. That distance for Lot 6 is 185 <br />feet. The actual main footage is 209 feet but it does not meet the strict reading of the lot width <br />requirement. The width at the 75-foot line is conforming. Barnhart stated there really is no opportunity <br />to adjust the side property lines to achieve the 200 feet and the applicant is requesting some flexibility to <br />the lot widths. <br /> <br />The applicant is proposing vegetation and buffering along the north and south property lines as well as <br />along the road. The land use and proposed density are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan guidance <br />for the property. The property currently contains one house located on the south side. This house will be <br />retained on what will be Lot 6. <br /> <br />The existing driveway off of Brown Road serving this house will be removed. Access to the subdivision <br />will be a new private road off of Brown Road. This private road will terminate in a cul-de-sac. The new <br />road appears to line up with the exit drive out of the Sugarwood development to the west. The 50-foot <br />right-of-way is consistent with Orono Code. The paved width is not defined but is required to be 28 feet <br />for this number of lots. The length of the cul-de-sac is approximately 927 feet, which is less than the <br />1,000-foot maximum. <br /> <br />There is an existing trail on the west side of Brown Road North. The plans do not suggest any interior <br />sidewalks or trails through the development. The plans also do not show any proposed park land <br />dedication. The Comprehensive Plan does not identify the need for additional park land. <br /> <br />At this stage the applicant is looking for feedback from the Planning Commission prior to submitting a <br />formal application. <br /> <br />Thiesse asked if everything else is compliant except for those two lots. <br />