My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-11-2019 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2019
>
02-11-2019 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/23/2019 1:53:00 PM
Creation date
5/23/2019 1:46:48 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
327
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />Tuesday, January 22, 2019 <br />6:30 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 3 of 3 <br /> <br />Landgraver asked if he has met with the neighbors. <br /> <br />Stedman indicated a neighborhood meeting was held on January 10, which in his view was positive. A <br />number of the neighbors were surprised that it was only seven lots but overall appeared pleased with the <br />development. <br /> <br />Thiesse asked if there is anyone who would like to comment on the sketch plan. <br /> <br />There were no public comments. <br /> <br />Landgraver stated as it relates to lot width, in his view there has been a good faith effort to accommodate <br />irregular shaped property and that the applicants are attempting to comply with the spirit of the law. <br />Because the house is so far back on Lot 3, it does not appear the lot width rules are meaningful for that <br />lot. <br /> <br />Erickson commented the plan appears to be well done. <br /> <br />Libby asked what the lakeshore lots will be priced at. <br /> <br />Stedman indicated they do not have any final pricing yet, but they are probably looking at $1.5 million <br />plus for the lot and house. <br /> <br />Libby commented it is an interesting project and he would be in favor of it. <br /> <br />Thiesse stated he is in agreement and that there could be some flexibility to the lot width for those two <br />lots. <br /> <br />The Planning Commission took no formal action on this item. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.