My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02-11-2019 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
2019
>
02-11-2019 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/23/2019 1:53:00 PM
Creation date
5/23/2019 1:46:48 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
327
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
FILE #LA 18-000095 <br />January 22, 2019 <br />Page 3 of 3 <br /> <br />4, to Long Lake Lake. This creek is considered a tributary, and the 75 lake yard applies. Lots 2 – <br />4 retain adequate buildable area, though a driveway to serve Lot 3 will need to go through this <br />setback area, and over the creek. The watershed district may have some comment on this <br />proposal. <br /> <br />A Conservation Design Plan will be required for this development per Section 82-300, and with it <br />the wetland delineations will be confirmed. <br /> <br />This project will trigger stormwater management rules. The applicant has been advised to visit <br />with the watershed district early in the subdivision design process. <br /> <br />Docks for lake lots 4, 5, and 6 may encroach into a wetland; these docks are limited to 8 feet in <br />width. <br /> <br />Public Comments <br />The applicant held a neighborhood meeting on January 10th. Staff was not in attendance, but the <br />applicant reported that about 9 neighboring residents were at the meeting and the concept was <br />generally well received. <br /> <br />Staff has received one comment letter. Though the letter incorrectly references a January 10, <br />2019 Council meeting, their comments are based on potential impacts to the wetland and creek; <br />these issues we are looking for feedback from the watershed district on. <br /> <br />Issues for Consideration <br />1. Does the Planning Commission have an opinion on the lot width issues identified for Lots <br />3 and 6? <br />2. Does the Planning Commission support some flexibility to the Average Lake Shore Setback <br />for lots 4 and 5? <br />3. Are there any other issues or concerns with this application? <br /> <br />List of Exhibits <br />Exhibit A. Application <br />Exhibit B. Proposed Plan <br />Exhibit C. Applicants Narrative <br />Exhibit D. Neighbor Comment Letter <br />Exhibit E. Location Map <br />Exhibit F. Aerial Photo <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.