Laserfiche WebLink
FILE # LA19-000004 <br />19 Feb 2019 <br />Page 3 of 6 <br /> <br />3. The impervious surface coverage meets all hardcover location and square footage <br />restrictions of this chapter and the total square footage of hardcover does not exceed <br />25 percent of the entire lot area. <br />4. All other zoning district standards can be met. <br />The applicant’s request for hardcover, setback, and height variances results in the property’s <br />inability to conform to all of the standards above. Therefore, lot area and width variances are <br />required in order to redevelop the property. The ability to develop the property consistent with <br />other existing developed properties in the neighborhood would be limited if the area and width <br />variances are not granted. <br /> <br />Rear Yard Setback Variance (Section 78-350) <br />The property’s ±130 feet of depth is challenging, particularly due to the applied average <br />lakeshore setback at approximately 70-feet from the OHWL, the 75-foot lake setback, and the <br />30-foot rear yard setback. The required setbacks leave an approximate 36 foot deep building <br />envelope which is not unreasonable, however is inconsistent with the two neighboring <br />properties and many of the rebuilds in the immediate neighborhood. <br /> <br />Hardcover; 75-Foot Setback Variances (Sections 78-1680 & 78-1700) <br />The existing home to be removed encroaches into the 75-foot and average lakeshore setbacks. <br />The new home is proposed to meet the average lakeshore setback and will encroach <br />approximately 5 feet into the 75-foot setback with the covered stoop, the home will encroach <br />about 2 feet. <br /> <br />The proposed hardcover level of 41.4% is a 412 square foot increase from the existing <br />conditions. The increase is primarily resulting from the increased building coverage. The <br />proposed home is nearly twice the size of the existing home. However, when you include the <br />existing detached garage, the overall proposed building coverage level is only increasing by 355 <br />square feet. The applicant is not maximizing the proposed building coverage due to the limiting <br />setbacks and hardcover. <br /> <br />Driveway Width Variance (Sections 78-1282; 78-1680, 78-1681) <br />The Code permits certain hardcover improvements within the 75-foot lake setback. An 8 foot <br />wide driveway is permitted in this area. Crystal Bay Road is a narrow roadway; its 20 foot width <br />does not allow for reasonable on street parking. The applicant has proposed a driveway with an <br />11.5 foot curb cut and a 25 foot wide garage access and parking area. The hardcover regulations <br />in the code specify a minimum width to match the garage doors serving the home which is <br />reasonable. Section 78-1282 which specifies an 8 foot maximum width appears to be in conflict <br />in this circumstance with Section 78-1681 which requires specific minimum widths. Based on an <br />aerial photo analysis, many of the properties along Crystal Bay Road have driveways exceeding 8 <br />feet in width within the 75-foot setback. <br /> <br />Height Variance (Sections 78-1 & 78-350) <br />The Code limits building height to a 30-foot maximum based on existing adjacent grade <br />elevations. The existing lot topography appears to be the result of grade manipulations to <br />facilitate the rear yard detached garage. The retaining walls along the rear property line created <br />a flat area inconsistent with the adjacent neighboring properties and a ‘natural grade’. The <br />applicant proposes to fill in this area and return to the original grades. The highest “existing <br />grade” from which the height calculation is based is 939.3’ rather than 946’ as is the highest