Laserfiche WebLink
FILE # LA19-000004 <br />19 Feb 2019 <br />Page 4 of 6 <br /> <br />grade in the proposed grading plan. The defined building height based on 939.3’ highest existing <br />is 36.7’ (6.7’ taller than permitted). When using the applicant’s restored highest grade of 946’ <br />the defined height calculation is conforming at 30 feet. <br /> <br />Building height means the vertical distance between the highest existing ground level or ten <br />feet above the lowest ground level, whichever is lower, and the top of the cornice of a flat <br />roof, or the deck line of a mansard roof, or the uppermost point on a round or other arch- <br />type roof, or the median height of the highest gable of a pitched or hipped roof. Topographic <br />changes which elevate the adjoining ground level above the existing terrain shall not be <br />considered in determining building height. <br /> <br />Governing Regulation: Variance (Section 78-123) <br />In reviewing applications for variance, the Planning Commission shall consider the effect of the <br />proposed variance upon the health, safety and welfare of the community, existing and <br />anticipated traffic conditions, light and air, danger of fire, risk to the public safety, and the effect <br />on values of property in the surrounding area. The Planning Commission shall consider <br />recommending approval for variances from the literal provisions of the Zoning Code in instances <br />where their strict enforcement would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique <br />to the individual property under consideration, and shall recommend approval only when it is <br />demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of the Orono Zoning <br />Code. Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties. Practical difficulties <br />also include but are not limited to inadequate access to direct sunlight for solar energy systems. <br />Variances shall be granted for earth-sheltered construction as defined in Minn. Stat. § 216C.06, <br />subd. 2, when in harmony with this chapter. The board or the council may not permit as a <br />variance any use that is not permitted under this chapter for property in the zone where the <br />affected person's land is located. The board or council may permit as a variance the temporary <br />use of a one-family dwelling as a two-family dwelling. <br /> <br />According to MN §462.537 Subd. 6(2) variances shall only be permitted when: <br />1. The variance is in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Ordinance. The <br />proposed variances are in harmony with the purpose of the Ordinance. The small lot <br />includes difficulties in its small size and width, manipulated topography, and proximity <br />to the lake. The lot is also challenged by Crystal Bay Road which runs through the lake <br />yard. The average lakeshore setback is proposed to be met protecting views of the lake <br />for adjacent properties. <br />2. The variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan. The proposed variances to <br />develop a nonconforming lot of record are consistent with the comprehensive plan. <br />3. The applicant establishes that there are practical difficulties. <br />a. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not <br />permitted by the official controls; The request to permit construction of the <br />home on the substandard lot, in the proposed location within the lake, and rear <br />yard setbacks, appears to be somewhat reasonable as the property’s reduced <br />size and orientation with respect to the lakeshore, Crystal Bay Road, and <br />adjacent properties creates difficulties. The hardcover level, grade correction, <br />and encroachments proposed within the lake yard appear to be reasonable. <br />b. There are circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner; <br />The uniquely small size, location with respect to the lake and roadway, and <br />required setbacks prevent a residential footprint consistent with the