Laserfiche WebLink
page 4 <br /> - Reconvened 1982 <br /> Board of Review <br /> _. June 29 , 1982 <br /> 13. John Eastman <br /> 2565 North Shore Drive <br /> 09-117-23 41 0004 <br /> No comments. Motion by Van Nest seconded by Butler t� <br /> accept the assessor' s $303,000 1982 market value. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> 14. Marilyn Thorne <br /> 2635 Casco Point Road <br /> 20-117-23 24 0031 <br /> Had requested and received a revaluation of her property. <br /> The assessor had made no change in the $157 ,700 valuation. <br /> Van Nest stated he was familiar with this property and <br /> felt that value was fair. Motion by Van Nest seconded <br /> by Frahm to accept the assessor' s value of $157 ,700. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> 15. Joyce Tweedt <br /> 2618 Casco Point Road <br /> 20-117-23 24 0038 <br /> No comments. Came to observe the meeting. No action. <br /> 16. Gitta Holzer <br /> 2677 Casco Point Road <br /> 20-117-23 23 0020 <br /> After she had requested a revaluation the assessor <br /> lowered the 1982 market value from $198,500. She felt <br /> this valuation was correct. Motion by Van Nest seconded <br /> by Hurr to accept the assessor' s value of $159 ,600. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> 17. Mrs. Harold Sullwold <br /> 3705 North Shore Drive <br /> 17-117-23 21 0011 <br /> She felt that the valuation on her property was too high <br /> compared to the neighbors valuation. The P�ayor was <br /> familiar with this property and agreed with Mrs. Sullwold. <br /> Motion by Van Nest seconded by Frahm to reduce the <br /> 1982 valuation of $153 ,700 by $2 ,200 to $151,500. Motion <br /> carried <br /> 18. George Norling <br /> 3800 Dickson Extension <br /> 17-117-23 31 0021 and <br /> 17-117-23 31 0020 <br /> Norling felt the values placed on these properties were <br /> too high. This property had not been reviewed by the <br /> assessor. Mayor stated the Board had no information <br /> on this property. Mayor suggested to the Board that <br /> they take this matter up at the second reconvened meeting <br /> June 30th at 7 : 00 p.m. after the Board has had a chance <br /> to inspect the property. In order to preserve his right <br /> to appeal at the County Board Van Nest made a motion and <br /> Butler seconded to adopt the assessor' s 1982 market <br /> value of $62 ,300 on P.I.D. number 17-117-23 31 0020 <br /> and $5 , 800 on P.I.D. number 17-117-23 31 0021 until <br />