06-15-1983 Council Minutes Reconvened Board of Review

Home Browse Search

apprcachesto $130 , 00� . TheBoardreminded Mr . Bie of his right to appeal tc the County Board on July 11 , 1983 , and that if he wanted to appear before them he should call 348-5�?ti to be placed on the agenda . After much discussion the Board agreed upon a total value on the 2 lots of $127 , 1�JPJ . Mction by Adams to place the 1983 market value on the ?_ lots at $127 , 1�� seconded by Frahm. Mction , Ayes ( 4) , Nays ( !�) . Frederic Riebel 44Q Stubbs Bay Road North 32-118-2� 13 HQ04 Mr . Riebel had been at the previous meeting but was not able to be heard by the Board . Mr . Riebel st�ted this property is la acres total , abcut 5 1/2 acres are wetlands . The house was built in 185� . The property is probably not divid�ble because cf the road frontage and the wetlands . Mr . Riebel had requested a revaluation of the property prior tc this meeting and was informed that the 1983 market value had been changed from $73 , 600 to $66 , �0D1 . Motion by Frahm seconded by Hammerel to direct the County Assessor ' s staff to review this property with the City Zcning Administrator to determine if this property could be subdivided and call the results of the reappraisal tc Dorothy Hallin who will report tc the Board at a reconvened meeting on June 7_� , 19�3 , at 7 : P��1 P. M. Motion , ( 4) , (G�) . N�ayor Butler announced to the audience that tMe Bcard would hear their comments and if the Board can do anything we will and if we can ' t we can ' t . We will take you in the order of your arrival at the Counci_1 Chambers . George Grooms 30�5 North Shore Drive [�9-117-23 32 0H01 Mr . Grocros stated , I received the ncti f ication that my homestead is still worth something over $145 , P1�0 . Having been through the whole course last year including the County Board of Equalizaticn and having experienced the frustration and futility of this exercise you may wonder why I am here . I keep concerning myself with the word equalization . I discovered last year the smaller your property is the more your gcing to be appraised for your lakeshore . I find this unfair . Mayor Butler explained that there is a fcrmula worked out with 1 building site at so much per front foot and then as you increase the width of the property along the lakeshcre the ratio goes down until you get to a point where you have 2 building sites and then it goes up. The Ccuncil explained to Mr . Grooms that he has riparian access to Lake Minnetonka . The F3oard reminded Mr . Grocros that the County Board will meet July 11 , 1983 , and he should call ahead to be placed on the agenda . page 3 of 6