Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING — SEPTEMBER 9, 1991 t <br />LAK9 MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT <br />JoEllen Hurr, City representative, explained that the LMCD <br />has two committees active. The first committee is in charge of <br />fees and they are proposing to raise fees to users by about <br />$50.000. They are hoping that this will keep the LMCD from <br />asking cities for any additional monies. Also, the late fee will <br />be changed to reflect a percentage of the fee owed and will go up <br />every month, as opposed to one flat late fee. <br />She went on to explain the other committee is an ethics <br />committee, which is working on the issue of interest or conflict <br />of interest by members of the board. She is concerned that <br />members of organizations on the board can vote on issues that <br />specifically help that organization. <br />Jabbour asked if this could pose a quorum problem. <br />Hurr noted that there are only three members who belong to a <br />specific organization. <br />Hurr mentioned the next meeting of Orono's Lake Use <br />Committee will be held on September 12th, and she will not be in <br />attendance. She submitted a redraft of three sections -of the <br />LMCD's plan, and explained a fourth section on implementation has <br />been redrafted but is not for public release yet. <br />Jabbour asked if these drafts have been adopted yet. He <br />explained that the Council was unable to attend the LMCD's last <br />meeting, but they were under the impression that language was to <br />be changed in the plan and a draft was to be sent to Orono which <br />was not yet received. <br />Callahan explained that there was a draft up for <br />consideration on August 21st and the Council was unable to attend <br />at that time because of a conflicting meeting. At that meeting, <br />at the request of.Callahan and Jabbour, the LMCD did make some <br />changes, and there was to be a redraft of the whole proposal. On <br />August 28th, the LMCD had another meeting and the Council was <br />again unable to attend, but Representative Hurr went and was able <br />to get the draft changed back to the way it was previously and <br />suggested that the LMCD was out of line to change it in the first <br />place. Callahan explained this was due to lack of communication <br />with Hurr. He noted that there is now another draft of another <br />section which will be submitted on September 12th. He felt it <br />was important to have Council represented at that meeting. <br />Jabbour did not concur that the Metropolitan Council was <br />drafting the plan as a committee of 40 edited the draft word by <br />word. He critized the Metropolitan Council for handing a draft <br />to the Council on a Monday with a scheduled meeting on Wednesday <br />to adopt that draft. <br />2 <br />