Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING — SEPTEMBER 9, 1991 <br />LAKE MINNETONKA CONSERVATION DISTRICT — CONT. <br />VIINN hl1 eI'1 +.,h ,at a i 1 chapter-s- .'..,..� l l 1. Vefo the B d t <br />Ilul 1 o u ,at i 1 `. pL� ... :1 i ;.7 >r u�.! tJ l'.. Uiv O�Jat U at <br />their meeting on the fourth =.�lednesday in September. At that <br />point the Metropolitan Council is asking the LMCD to ratify it or <br />send on to the cities for comment. It was clear, from the <br />Metropolitan Council that the cities did not have another vote on <br />the issue. <br />Callahan suggested that Jabbour attend the meeting on <br />September 12th and the rest of Orono's Lake Use Committee could <br />meet at Orono. <br />Hurr suggested that the Orono Lake Use Committee meetings be <br />scheduled for mornings instead which may be better for <br />attendance. She noted that the LMCD is under a time schedule set <br />by the Metropolitan Council. She advised that she had the draft <br />changed at the last meeting because of what is implied in Orono's <br />Comprehensive Plan. <br />Callahan noted the minutes of the LMCD's Technical Committee <br />dealt entirely with discussion about storm water management. He <br />felt that their original purpose was to review the DNR's proposed <br />shoreland regulations. <br />Hurr -noted that the regulations encompassed the issue of <br />storm Water management. <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />Ann Cosgrove, 1895 Fox Ridge Road, thanked the Council for <br />the manner in 'which they handled the meeting with Long Lake on <br />September 4th. She noted that they did an outstanding job on <br />representing Orono no new roadbed position" and made a <br />preliminary gesture to assist Long Lake should Highway 12 stay in <br />the existing corridor. She felt they made a very positive <br />impression on Steve Hay as :,ell as other people in attendance. <br />(##4) #1663 MARK JOHNSON, <br />4465 BAYSIDE ROAD — PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION <br />RESOLUTION #3014 <br />Mark Johnson was present for this application. <br />City Administrator Moorse explained that this application <br />involves the subdivision of one lot into two. He noted that all <br />lots meet the lot area standards. He noted that. the issues <br />involved are listed in the Planning Commission's recommendation <br />of approval. <br />Mayor Peterson noted there is a blank date on the resolution <br />for the removal of the shed and pole barn. <br />