My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-26-1991 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
08-26-1991 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/30/2019 8:44:32 AM
Creation date
4/30/2019 8:44:31 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING — AUGUST 26, 1991 <br />ZONING FILE #1666 — CONT. <br />It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by. Butler, to adopt <br />Resolution #3009, granting a renewal variance for Michael <br />Hilbelink for property located at 2180 Prospect Avenue. Ayes 4, <br />nays 0. <br />( #11'x) TEMPORARY SIGN ORDINANCE <br />ORDINANCE #97, SECOND SERIES <br />It was moved by Butler, seconded by Goetten, to adopt <br />Ordinance #97, Second Series establishing standards for the use <br />of temporary signs, banners, and advertising balloons. Ayes 4, <br />nays 0. <br />REQUEST FOR ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL <br />Mabusth explained the Mr. Walker currently has an after —the- <br />fact variance application before the City. He is proposing to <br />square off a portion of his house by the addition of a second <br />story and additions to existing deck. She explained the Planning <br />Commission tabled his application. <br />Walker noted that the deck portion which encroaches within <br />0 -75' has been eliminated. <br />Mabusth explained where the second story addition is <br />proposed, this would be viewed as an intensification of structure <br />where excessive amounts of hardcover exist. <br />Richard Schieffer, attorney for Mr. Walker, noted that the <br />building permit is being withheld because of a zoning issue, but <br />felt this should not be done as the structure meets building code <br />standards. <br />Jabbour felt that the Council should do whatever can be done <br />to help the applicant, but wanted to know what assurances does <br />the City have that the requirements be met. <br />Goetten wanted to know what liability the City would have if <br />this were allowed. <br />Schieffer explained the owners have resided there for 20 <br />years. They hired a builder who did some demo work inside, <br />applied for the permit, and then continued beyond demolition and <br />started building the structure. The applicant is requesting an <br />extension because his mortgage commitment expires October 6th and <br />the builder estimates at least 6 weeks of work. <br />Butler suggested that the permit be issued conditioned on <br />all documentation for the September Planning Commission meeting <br />be submitted by the deadline date, and if not, a Stop Work Order <br />be placed on the project. <br />7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.