My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-15-2009 Council Minutes
Orono
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
Historical
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
04-15-2009 Council Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/1/2012 9:40:42 AM
Creation date
6/1/2012 9:40:42 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO BOARD OF APPEAL AND EQUALIZATION <br />Wednesday, April 15, 2009 <br />Alk 7:00 o'clock p.m. <br />ROLL <br />The Orono Board of Appeal and Equalization met on the above - mentioned date with the following people <br />present: Mayor James White, Council Members James Murphy, Lili McMillan, and Doug Franchot. <br />Representing Staff were City Administrator William Wells, Finance Director Ron Olson, Hennepin <br />County Appraisers Thomas Kunik, Nathan Stulc, Tim Atchison, and Recorder Jackie Young. Council <br />Member Bremer arrived at 7:08 p.m. <br />Mayor White called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. <br />APPEALS <br />White stated the purpose of tonight's meeting is to review people's assessments and to give the residents <br />an opportunity to explain in their view why their assessments are incorrect. <br />1. Mary and Mike Plank, 4145 Watertown Road, PID 31- 118 -23 41 -0013 <br />Mrs. Plank stated one of the main reasons they are here tonight questioning their valuation relates to the <br />lack of comparables that were provided by the Assessor's Office. Plank indicated she personally had a <br />very difficult time finding comparables in Orono. One of the comparables is for a property valued in <br />excess of a million dollars, which in her view is not a good comparable since they do not have any. <br />fencing, a pool, or indoor riding arena. <br />McMillan asked whether the Planks feel there is something that the assessor should consider. <br />Mrs. Plank stated they basically disagreed with the comparable because the other property has been <br />improved and there are horses on the property. Due to the high taxes they have had to pay over the years, <br />they have been unable to make improvements to their property and that in their opinion the valuation is <br />too high. <br />McMillan asked whether this is a property that would eventually be subdivided. <br />Kunik indicated he did speak with the Planks and that it was his understanding that the property owner <br />Would get back to him with some comparables or market analysis and that he did not hear from the <br />Planks. Kunik stated the Planks had mentioned a possible wetland on the property, which was adjusted, <br />but the Planks were not satisfied with the adjustment. Kunik stated he has'come up with some other <br />comparables and would be willing to review the property again. <br />Mr. Plank asked what information has been obtained by the Assessor's Office. <br />Kunik stated they have come up with other similar properties in the City. <br />Mr. Plank asked whether those comparables are properties that have been sold within the required time <br />frame. <br />Kunik indicated they are not sold properties. <br />PAGE 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.