Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO BOARD OF APPEAL AND EQUALIZATION <br />Wednesday, April 15, 2009 <br />7:00 o'clock p.m. • <br />White requested the Assessor's Office review the new information with the Planks. White noted if this is <br />a property that can be subdivided, the property tends to be worth more. <br />Mr. Plank noted he has one lot and that he does not want to be in a position where he is forced to <br />subdivide his property due to the taxes. Plank stated they have not made any improvements to their <br />property and that it is still the original house. Plank indicated he does not understand why they are <br />discussing a possible future lot in relation to his taxes. <br />Kunik stated the Assessor's Office did not take the possible subdivision in the future into consideration <br />when assessing this property and that the comparables provided by the Planks were not proper <br />comparables. Kunik*noted they did adjust the valuation downward and that the comparables are limited <br />given the minimal amount of sales in the area. <br />Murphy stated it appears that the Assessor's Office was waiting to hear back from the Planks and that the <br />Assessor's Office has indicated they have some additional information that they would be willing to <br />review with the Planks. <br />Mrs. Plank pointed out that there were no other comparables relating to sold properties that could be <br />shared with the Assessor's Office. <br />Kunik stated they would contact the Planks within the next week to discuss their situation. <br />2. Richard Crosby, 2705 Walter Port Lane, PID 21- 117 -23 23 -0013 <br />Crosby noted he has provided some comparables of sold properties to the Assessor's Office and that his <br />property is a channel property, which should be valued less than lakeshore. Both of his neighbors have <br />similar sized lots, slightly bigger homes, but his taxes for the past three years have been approximately <br />$1000 higher than either of them. Crosby stated he told the Assessor last year that house values would <br />fall, and that he was told last year by the Assessor that lakeshore values will not fall, which has not been <br />the case. <br />Crosby stated in his view the property values are over- inflated. At the time he purchased his property, his <br />taxes were $5,658 but are now at $8,341. His property is now worth less than what he paid for it in 2005. <br />On average he has paid over $1000 more than both of his neighbors for the past three years. A previous <br />assessor has stated that the private road is a luxury but yet the costs for maintaining the road are borne by <br />the residents. Crosby noted his property also had significant drainage issues that he was forced to correct <br />at his expense with no assistance from the City. Crosby asked the Assessor to provide him with <br />comparables of sold properties. <br />Kunik noted that Assessor Stulc has a comparable for 997 Wildhurst, which is also a channel property on <br />Forest Arm Bay. The property has a house consisting of 1,812 square feet that was constructed in 1973 <br />and sold for $850,000 in November of 2007. Mr. Crosby's house consists of 3,294 square feet, which is <br />substantially bigger and newer. Kunik stated in his view the value is appropriate. <br />Crosby stated Fennon Lane has a brand -new house consisting of 4,000 plus square feet located on the <br />channel and it sold for $730,000. <br />Kunik stated the Assessor's Office looks at highest and best use and that they are not looking for the <br />lowest property value but the highest property values, which is what the State requires. <br />PAGE 2 <br />