Laserfiche WebLink
HIHUTBS OP THE PLMnilW: OMMISSIOH MBBTIHG HELD JUEE 6, 1988 <br />ATTEEDABCB 7:23 P.N. <br />The Orono Planning Commission met on the above date with <br />the following members present: Chairman Kelley, <br />Bellows, Moos, and Johnson. Hanson, Cohen, and Brown <br />were absent. The following represented the City staff: <br />Building S Zoning Adminstrator Mabusth, Assistant <br />Planning fc Zoning Administrator Gaffron, and City <br />Recorder Peterson. CounciImember Sime was also present. <br />#1289 ROBERT i ARM WILL <br />115 OLD CRYSTAL BAT ROAD WORTH <br />CLASS III PRELINIHART SOBDIVISIOH <br />PUBLIC HEARIW6 7:24-7:37 <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing <br />were noted. <br />Present for this matter were applicants, Robert & Ann <br />Will, and owner of the property, Vernice White. <br />Mabusth explained the proposed 3-lot plat of a total of <br />8.03 acres. Each lot satisfies the 2 acre dry <br />contiguous land area requirement and the 200' width to <br />the rear of the front yard setback line. The existing <br />house on Lot 2, Block 2, will continue to use the <br />existing access off Old Crystal Bay Road. The other two <br />lots will achieve access via an extension of Wear Lane <br />North. Septic testing has been done and confirms <br />adequate area available for sewage treatment systems. <br />Kelley mentioned the issue of putting in a temporary <br />road across Lot 2 to serve the two new lots until such <br />time that Wear Lane North becomes a public road, in lieu <br />of paying the fee to the owner of Wear Lane North for <br />the use of the road. <br />Mr. Will stated that because of the recommended time <br />deadline, they may eventually have to pay the fee for <br />the use of Wear Lane North in addition to putting in a <br />temporary road. <br />Mabusth noted staff's recommendation for a cul-de-sac <br />from the outlot. <br />Kelley recommended tabling the application until the <br />exact location of the temporary road is determined. <br />Mabusth recommended that the Planning Commission pass <br />the application on to the Council because the access <br />may be an issue the Planning Commission cannot solve and <br />should be resolved by the Council.