06-06-1988 Planning Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

M ms or fnt fiuunus coMussioii I joini •« lfl» 912Sf mu COBTIMID Bttllows f«lt it was the Planning Coeeission's responsibility to define the access location before passing the application on to the Council. She also noted there is a chance that the tMiporary access eight becoee the permanent access if the homeowners association denies access from the outlot. Planning Commission stated they would like to see a plan with a cul-de**sac from the outlot; and a plan with a 50* easement location for a temporary/permanent driveway access and its impact on the lot sizes. There were no comments from the public regarding this •1025 4115 me I. It was moved by Kelley, seconded by Johnson, to table this a|q;>lication pending the above stated information. Motion, Ayes 4, Hays 0. . I I tlCH ’ «e: COmiHOATIOM OP PUBLIC 1BAB1B6 7s3S-Bs00 The Certificate of Mailing was noted. Present for this matter were Edward and Phyllis Henricb and their attorney, George MacDonald. Gaffron explained that the applicant owns a 0.19 acre lot next to his existing house and would like to build a new house on the lot. Lot area and lot width variances are required to build on this lot. In addition, according to the proposed plan, an average lakeshore setback variance and hardcover variance would be needed. mm ♦Edward Henrich explained his plan to eventually build a house on this property since he bought it noting that a house existed on the lot until 1975. He stated that the adjacent neighbor approves of the proposal. He noted that the proposed house would not encroach the 0>75' lakeshore setback area, has an existing sewer connection, and they have no plans for a deck or patio or garage due to the topography of the lot. He stated it was their desire to build a retirement home on thii. lot. Kelley felt is was inevitable that a future garage would be requested.